XPost: talk.politics.drugs   
   From: erj66@xs4all.nl   
      
   On 12-01-2004 23:11, in article btv5v0$9f6$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu, "Brother   
   Nate"  wrote:   
      
   > JAD *does* have a good reason to try to present a convincing position,   
   > but there's no reason at all for him to feel disappointed if he fails   
   > to change your mind.   
      
      
   He claims not to care about convincing us, yet he never fails to respond to   
   any criticism of his posts.   
      
   He -could- change my mind if he 1) would present his evidence or 2) if any   
   of the science pointed his way.   
      
   EJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)