XPost: talk.politics.drugs   
   From: erj66@xs4all.nl   
      
   On 15-01-2004 06:03, in article 6o7c00p9i9v6etor238ikio7fu0uh3qpih@4ax.com,   
   "Mike Helm"  wrote:   
      
   > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:32:21 +0100, Eric Johnson    
   >   
   >> On 13-01-2004 17:01, in article bu14m0$tfd$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu, "Brother   
   >> Nate"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Any politician who overspends the public coffers the way   
   >>> Mr Bush has ought to be able to buy a lot of votes.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> NOT Bush, not Clinton, nor Reagan are/were responsible for spending. The   
   >> freaks in the House and Senate are.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Could someone remind Bush that he does have a veto?   
      
   A veto which would shut down the government and those o, so important   
   transfer payments called Social Security and welfare?   
      
   Hardly an option, though I do chastise Bush for profligate overspending and   
   breaking his promise to let the states decide about medical marijuana.   
      
   What could be more compassionate than for the conservatives to give on this   
   one point?   
      
   But these two bad points are not enough to get me to vote for Howard Dean or   
   whoever the Demo nominee is.   
      
   EJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)