O.K so someone here is posting as Zaphon B. while I'm using Zaphod   
   which of us should switch nics stimpy   
      
   Zaphod B. "stil prez"   
      
      
   "Zaphon B."  wrote in message   
   news:wSPsc.99855$vn.269104@sea-read.news.verio.net...   
   > Sorry Stimpy, your lawyer BROKE the LAW!!! SHOW ME PROOF! What was the   
   case,   
   > where! Why was there no local sherrifs dept, dea, etc who could take   
   > custody!   
   > Your STORY is WRONG, YOU ARE WRONG, admit it and move on like an adult!   
   > "Stimpy65"  wrote in message   
   > news:LmFsc.18255$Hh.9670@fe1.texas.rr.com...   
   > > >IT IS NEVER, EVER, LEGAL to DESTROY evidence while the case is going   
   on!   
   > It   
   > > just ISN'T done!!!   
   > >   
   > > Yes, it is. Lawyer in the family. I know this to be a fact. Does it   
   always   
   > > happen that way? Of course not. Yes, most of the time, the state and fed   
   > > can't fuck with evidence at all. However, there are certain   
   circumstances   
   > > where evidence may legally be destroyed prior to some court cases   
   > depending   
   > > on certain criteria.   
   > > As an example, a large drug bust in an area where law enforcement does   
   not   
   > > have secure storage facilities within the jurisdiction that can handle   
   the   
   > > volume seized. Happens along the Mexico border frequently. This is not   
   the   
   > > only situation where evidence can be destroyed prior to a court case   
   > either.   
   > > Red, you REALLY need to shut your pie-hole because it's real obvious   
   that   
   > > your a dumbass and you don't know what the fuck your talking about. You   
   > seem   
   > > to have decided to fuck with me for some reason and I am going to   
   > thoroughly   
   > > enjoy putting you in your place every time you even think of spouting   
   off   
   > > any of your claptrap bullshit. LOL!   
   > > Now, back to our show...   
   > >   
   > > "Panama Red"  wrote in message   
   > > news:NLmsc.99370$vn.268904@sea-read.news.verio.net...   
   > > > Stimpy,   
   > > > yes, thats based on evidence that is NOT SUBJECT to return!   
   > > > Where there is a case to RETURN they are prohibited from destroying!   
   > But,   
   > > > lets clarify something....   
   > > > IT IS NEVER, EVER, LEGAL to DESTROY evidence while the case is going   
   on!   
   > > It   
   > > > just ISN'T done!!!   
   > > > There are too many motions etc. dealing with the evidence that would   
   > > > prohibit even touching it without authorization, let alone DESTROY   
   it!!!   
   > > > For those who DONT believe it true, check out eddy lepps website and   
   see   
   > > > pictures of the sherrifs office (In charge of storing evidence)   
   politely   
   > > > return the medicine!!   
   > > > It is done everyday in Ca!!   
   > > > Now, for the REST of US!!!   
   > > >   
   > > > "Stimpy65"  wrote in message   
   > > > news:ndTrc.14366$9f6.5867@fe2.texas.rr.com...   
   > > > > Based on previous knowledge of how law enforcement behaves in cases   
   > like   
   > > > > this, drugs are one of the few types of evidence (especially in   
   cases   
   > > > where   
   > > > > there are large amounts involved) that can legally be destroyed   
   prior   
   > to   
   > > a   
   > > > > court case as long as that drug evidence is properly witnessed,   
   > > > > photographed, and documented. I would be willing to bet that the DEA   
   > has   
   > > > > already destroyed most if not all of the leaf and, if forced to   
   return   
   > > it,   
   > > > > they will simply arrange some type of monitary restitution. How they   
   > > would   
   > > > > calculate the value I don't know.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > "Zaphon B."  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:ZbCrc.32527$Wg6.22971@bignews5.bellsouth.net...   
   > > > > > Well the stage seems to be set for a real show down.   
   > > > > > The circuit court and the highest judge in the state of California   
   > has   
   > > > > told   
   > > > > > the DEA to return all the equipment, pot etc.   
   > > > > > to the compassionate pot group.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > John Asscraft and his JD buddies have files a motion with the   
   > supreme   
   > > > > court   
   > > > > > to have the lower courts   
   > > > > > decision over turned, so where do we really stand.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, which I don't   
   believe   
   > > they   
   > > > > > will because the Feds are so   
   > > > > > stupid they are trying to make it a case of interstate commerce   
   > > > violation   
   > > > > > which it clearly wasn't as   
   > > > > > all the materials etc was all 100% from CA. So I don't think they   
   > will   
   > > > > touch   
   > > > > > this turd.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > So it seems as it stands.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > US Supreme Court Agrees to hear the case and all bets are off   
   > because   
   > > > > things   
   > > > > > are going to get stupid fast   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Or   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > US Supreme Court refuses to hear the case and the DEA has to by   
   law   
   > > > return   
   > > > > > all the materials seized and   
   > > > > > shut the fuck up.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > So is the DEA actually going to have to walk over and return OH MY   
   > GOD   
   > > > > > actual marijuana to sick people.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > How is this going to shake out. Any thoughts.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > I'm a newbie so HI EVERYONE. Sorry if this has been talked to   
   death   
   > > but   
   > > > > I'm   
   > > > > > interested in anyone's take on this.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Will the 9 states that have O.K medical MJ going to win out or is   
   > the   
   > > > > what.   
   > > > > > 80 years of prohibition going to continue?   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Zaphod   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)