XPost: alt.abortion, alt.society.liberalism, alt.activism.death-penalty   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: newses@spencersoft.com   
      
   On 3/4/2024 4:54 PM, Michael Christ wrote:   
   > On 5/03/2024 6:24 am, Randolf Richardson 張文道 wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 08:08:30 -0600   
   >> Gregory Greenman  wrote:   
   >>> On 3/3/2024 12:37 AM, Michael Christ wrote:   
   >>>> On 3/03/2024 5:20 pm, Gregory Greenman wrote:   
   >>>>> On 3/2/2024 6:05 PM, Michael Christ wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Think about it. He has to believe that the ===>>> testimony <<<=== of   
   >>>>>> the talking donkey is true in the bible in order to refute it. Get   
   >>>>>> it?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, not at all. We know that donkeys don't talk, so that story is   
   >>>>> obviously untrue. That's the point.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Read what I wrote again without snipping it to what you would like.   
   >>>   
   >>> Okay, I've done that. What you said is still wrong. Just like the bible.   
   >>   
   >> ...and just like how we know that talking donkeys   
   >> aren't real, we also know talking snakes aren't   
   >> real.  In fact, it's even more preposterous to   
   >> claim that snakes can talk since they don't even   
   >> have vocal folds or a voice box.   
   >>   
   >> (I like the point you made about the donkeys not   
   >> being able to talk.)   
   >>   
   >   
   > Where in the bible does it talk about a talking snake?   
      
      
      
   At the start. It's in Genesis:   
      
   Genesis 3:1 (KJV)   
   Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the   
   Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye   
   shall not eat of every tree of the garden?   
      
   I'm surprised you didn't know this already. So, now you realize that the   
   bible is just a book of mythology, right?   
      
      
      
   Greg   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)