Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.socialism    |    Everything thats yours is now mine    |    19,808 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,984 of 19,808    |
|    New York Libertarians to Steven Schneider    |
|    Re: Attack on Democracy in Ford Nation    |
|    26 Sep 18 08:25:14    |
      51885442       From: wernerhetzner@gmail.com              On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 11:27:19 PM UTC-4, Steven Schneider wrote:       >....       >        > Hence my claim will be that it is easier to maintain a free market        > when there is wealth redistribution, because consumers which        > represent those who truly benefit from free market competition will        > have the political power to maintain this system. They will have        > this power because redistribution mechanism will make sure they        > don’t lose so much income and wealth as to also loose political        > influence.       >        > Ideally a stable society needs to offer a mechanism for different        > interest groups in a society to fight for influence and balance each        > other out."       >        >               So you and I have different ideas to "balance each other out". Lets do a       'thought experiment'. Assume there are just two interest groups: A and B.       Which will redistribute wealth to avoid political instability?               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca