Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.socialism    |    Everything thats yours is now mine    |    19,807 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,808 of 19,807    |
|    rbowman to New York Libertarians    |
|    Re: The centrally planned economy is a b    |
|    09 Nov 19 12:13:31    |
      From: bowman@montana.com              On 11/09/2019 08:40 AM, New York Libertarians wrote:       > On Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 6:15:06 AM UTC-5, The greatest truth is       honesty wrote:       >> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:55:24 -0700, rbowman wrote:       >>       >>> On 11/06/2019 04:27 AM, Jos Boersema wrote:       >>>> Land underpins a free market economy, and it is an insurance policy for       >>>> people who become unemployed. It allows those who want to, to start a       >>>> business very easily, and it also challenges those to do that even if       >>>> they do not want to, but they must because they must eat and they can       >>>> otherwise not find a serf position that pays them enough. Getting a job       >>>> is in the end a privilege, you cannot rely on it.       >>>       >>> I have never owned land and had no problem starting a business. In fact       >>> being linked to a specific geographical point would have been       >>> detrimental. Some of us a hunter-gatherers, so to speak, some are       >>> farmers. Historically, the concept of owning a particular chunk of the       >>> earth lead to hierarchical social structures and serfdom.       >>>       >>       >> Hunting tribes consider that some areas belong to them.       >       >       > “Historically, the concept of owning a particular chunk of the       > earth lead to hierarchical social structures and serfdom.”       >       > The USSR was but one example where NOT owning land led to hierarchical       social structures and serfdom. Besides, I can’t think of an example of a       society without a social structure. it seems to me ‘serfdom’ is       involuntary by definition. It requires        imposition which requires force and power, not land.       >              What is the genesis of force and power? What makes some pigs more equal?       When does the transition from following a war chief proven in battle or       supporting a village elder with the wisdom of years to coercion, however       well masked, come?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca