Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.socialism    |    Everything thats yours is now mine    |    19,807 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,890 of 19,807    |
|    New York Libertarians to Byker    |
|    Re: 9 Most Terrifying Moments from the D    |
|    22 Dec 19 13:55:31    |
      From: wernerhetzner@gmail.com              On Sunday, December 22, 2019 at 1:14:44 PM UTC-5, Byker wrote:       > "Ubiquitous" wrote in message       > news:c5-dnWy7gZviBmLAnZ2dnUU7-KWdnZ2d@giganews.com...       > >       > > Here are the nine most terrifying moments from Thursday night’s Democrat       > > debate. You can basically sum things up this way: if the Democrats ever       > > recapture power, illegal aliens will have more rights than American       > > citizens.       > >       > > 9 Andrew “Free Money” Yang       > >       > > America’s sexism can only be atoned for with open borders:       > >       > > Moderator: If you win and you reinstate DACA, another president could just       > > overturn it again. So will you move on a permanent legislative fix for       > > dreamers in your first 100 days, if elected?       > >       > > Yang: Of course I would. I’m the son of immigrants myself, and I know       that       > > dreamers are essentially Americans in everything but this legal       > > classification. I just want to return to this conversation because I think       > > it’s core. Our country is deeply misogynist, and most all of us know       that.       > > Money and men are tied together.       >        > No one dares criticize Yang, lest they be accused of "Sinophobia".       >        > Never mind that "guaranteed basic income" has failed everywhere it's been       > tried, including the U.S., as Mimi Texeira of The Daily Signal noted       > recently: "In the 1970s, the (U.S.) government ran four random control       > experiments across six states to try the negative income tax, a similar       > policy proposal (to the basic income) that was popular at the time. In each       > test, the work disincentive effect was disastrous. For every $1,000 in added       > benefits to a family, there was an average reduction in $660 of wages from       > work."       > https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/02/26/california-city-trying-       niversal-basic-income-weve-already-seen-doesnt-work/       >        > It didn't work in Finland: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki0MPrn9MPM       >        > It didn't work in Ontario: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t33UVDIX0z8       >        > And it won't work in California: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yCS9faKC6A       >        > That's right. A basic income would tax work to the hilt so that others could       > be paid to do nothing. Common sense dictates that you reward work, not       > punish it. The Finns figured it out. Why haven't we?                     The objective is to buy votes. Getting free stuff is popular. Many people vote       for a living instead work for a living.       http://www.endit.info/Theft.shtml              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca