home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.socialism      Everything thats yours is now mine      19,807 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,166 of 19,807   
   Jos Boersema to Jos Boersema   
   Re: New law proposal: _6.3.a-6 Working a   
   07 Aug 20 12:50:45   
   
   From: joshb@xs4all.nl   
      
   On 2020-08-05, Jos Boersema  wrote:   
   > On 2020-08-05, Jos Boersema  wrote:   
   >> _6.3.a-6 Working as Equals   
   >>   
   >>  If a business is using the bulk of an average person their productive   
   >>  capacity for a year, the employee(s) have the right to buy themselves   
   >>  an equal ownership in that business.   
      
   Some more finetuning: Changed price of a share to buy in from share of   
   Capital plus one fifth, to one tenth. Reduced complexity of price for   
   owner removal, because it can be further detailed in a norma law (which   
   is something that could be improved in other places in this Constitution   
   proposal as well, because at times it seems a bit overly detailed).   
      
   _6.3.a-6.1 Equal price   
      
    The price of the sale is the replacement value of all that is being   
    used by the business, divided by how many owners the business will   
    have, plus one tenth of the price.   
   .   
   . Reasoning. The starter will receive a compensation plus a profit,   
   . which is both simply to make the transfer fair, and to attempt to   
   . make the owner satisfied and therefore well motivated to work in   
   . the new arrangement. Anywhere between one tenth to a fifth   
   . seems reasonable. Because “replacement value” is a relatively   
   . high value for a good, potentially exchanging an old device for   
   . a new device, one tenth.   
      
   _6.3.a-6.5 Owner removal   
      
    When an owner is removed from working there by the decision of   
    the majority of the other owners, he shall be duly compensated.   
      
   . Reasoning. It being a democratic form of decision making,   
   . this would have to include removing people from the business.   
   . It makes sense that if someone is removed against their will,   
   . they get the money back which he or she originally had payed,   
   . or their current share in that business, or some other reasonable   
   . amount. Since it is not a market transaction, it may need to be   
   . defined in law further.   
   . This money will hopefully make the occurrence be less painful   
   . for the owner who is being removed, while those doing the   
   . removal will need a reason good enough equal to the sum to be   
   . payed.   
      
   --   
   https://market.socialism.nl How economics works, and how to get it fixed.   
   Free Julian Assange and all other people attacked by western Fascism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca