XPost: aus.politics, can.politics, uk.politics.misc
From: daniel47@eternal-september.org
Dechucka wrote on 22/09/2020 6:53 AM:
> On 21/09/2020 10:57 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Dechucka wrote on 19/09/2020 10:04 AM:
>>
>>
>>
>>> All the rain has done has buggered up the HR program only 30% has
>>> been done state-wide and if we get a week of hot NWesters it will
>>> dry all the new growth out.
>>
>> Dechucka, (being the local (i.e. this newsgroup) RFS Rep) what is the
>> process here??
>
> Mate I'm down the bottom end of the RFS food chain, I don't even get fed
>>
>> At the start of the 'season' does the RFS/Environment Dept/Whomever
>> decide that this year there should be (pick a figure, any figure)
>> 100,000 Hectares burned off before the Summer starts.
>
> I believe that it is a strategic long term, 10 years?, plan on what
> burns should be done by all the whoevers with input from councils, RFS,
> NPWS etc. At the local level we put forward ideas for tactical HRs that
> we hope will protect assets.
>
>>
>> Then, when that figure is not reached (due to wet weather/hot
>> weather/lack of volunteers/whatever), maybe only 50,000 Hectares is
>> actually burner off, is the following target figure increased to take
>> into account the 'under-burn' of the previous season, e.g. next
>> seasons target might be 150,000 Hectares instead of just 100,000
>> Hectares??
>
> They still stay on the system here was a big HR down the Sth coast that
> was done this year that they've been trying to do for 5 years. One of
> the problems I assume is resources with many HRs dependent on volunteers.
>>
>> Or is it just a 'random' target figure chosen each year dependant of
>> actual growth??
>
> No
>
Thank you.
--
Daniel
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
