Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.socialism    |    Everything thats yours is now mine    |    19,807 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,418 of 19,807    |
|    Steve to posing as Don Kresch    |
|    Re: NO, liberals aren't left-wing Marxis    |
|    10 Oct 20 23:22:47    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics       XPost: us.poli tics       From: no@mail.thanks              q9c4of976oe6f52n476vsqcsk05roo7g0h@4ax.com posing as Don Kresch wrote:              > On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:22:45 -0000 (UTC), Malcolm McMahon       > malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk        ________________       >> Marxists tend to regard socialists with contempt,       >>       NO they don't. However not all socialist ideologies were based during the       days of Marx, before and/or after, on proper socioeconomic analysis.       See for instance, going back as far as Plato's philosophy or back that       English humanist Sir Thomas More (see in his Utopia 1516), or the French       Revolution (1789) or look at the Fabian Society which started during the       late Nineteenth Century just to name a few. Do not forget many of the       religions teaching certain forms of socialist ideals.              Marxism is NOT about contempt, but it is about creating a better and more       resilient future society based on properly understanding past       socioeconomic anomalies plaguing human societies throughout history.       >       > Then why did Marx and Engels use socialism and communism       > interchangeably?       >       They did NOT. Try reading before you pontificate.       >       >> because it's actually a       >> measured dose of socialism that has _prevented_ the prolitarian       >> revolution in the places it has been applied. Marx, quite rightly I       >> think, predicted that unrestrained capitalism would       >       > 1. Marx listed every economic fallacies in capitalism there are.       >       Typo corrected free of charge!       >       > 2. Name even one place where there has been "unrestrained       > captialism". Even one.       >       Easy peasy! Take for instance the USA, UK, Chile and the Philippines.       Capitalist corporations and billionaires run the show (specially the       governments) for their own profit accumulation schemes almost 100%       unrestrained. Fuck the rest of the population.       >        > Marx was piss-poor at economics.       >       YAWN!       >       > Socialism is how to spread misery.              BS       Socialism how you lift society to a more equitable level.              --       'Steve'              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca