XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc
XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk
From: the_todal@icloud.com
On 14/01/2017 21:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:43:01 -0000, Bod wrote:
>
>> On 14/01/2017 07:39, Vidcapper wrote:
>>> On 13/01/2017 19:06, The Todal wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2017 16:46, GB wrote:
>>>>> On 13/01/2017 16:36, burfordTjustice wrote:
>>>>>> A 47-year-old man was convicted of rape because he took off a condom
>>>>>> during sex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the news agency RTS, a criminal court in Switzerland
>>>>>> ruled that if a condom was expected but not used, having intercourse
>>>>>> without one legally constitutes sexual assault.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The French man met a Swiss woman on Tinder back in 2015. The woman
>>>>>> said she only discovered the condom had been removed once they had
>>>>>> finished having sex. The man received a 12-month suspended sentence
>>>>>> after his conviction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any views on the legality?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's the same decision that our own courts made when considering Julian
>>>> Assange's extradition. He had sex with a woman knowing that she would
>>>> only consent if he used a condom. He either removed it or tore it
>>>> (so it
>>>> is alleged) and our courts have said that this could be construed as
>>>> rape.
>>>
>>> Does it count a rape if it accidentally splits during the act...
>>>
>> It can't be because it's simply an accident and is in no way intentional.
>
> Even if it was, have these women not heard of the morning after pill?
>
Assange's victim was mainly concerned with the possibility of having
caught a sexually transmitted disease from him. He didn't give a shit
about her worries, though. His own satisfaction took priority.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
