XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: burfordTjustice@tues.uk   
      
   On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 00:46:49 -0000   
   "James Wilkinson Sword"  wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:11:45 -0000, The Todal    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On 14/01/2017 21:00, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:   
   > >> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:43:01 -0000, Bod    
   > >> wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On 14/01/2017 07:39, Vidcapper wrote:   
   > >>>> On 13/01/2017 19:06, The Todal wrote:   
   > >>>>> On 13/01/2017 16:46, GB wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On 13/01/2017 16:36, burfordTjustice wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> A 47-year-old man was convicted of rape because he took off a   
   > >>>>>>> condom during sex.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> According to the news agency RTS, a criminal court in   
   > >>>>>>> Switzerland ruled that if a condom was expected but not used,   
   > >>>>>>> having intercourse without one legally constitutes sexual   
   > >>>>>>> assault.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>  The French man met a Swiss woman on Tinder back in 2015. The   
   > >>>>>>> woman said she only discovered the condom had been removed   
   > >>>>>>> once they had finished having sex. The man received a   
   > >>>>>>> 12-month suspended sentence after his conviction.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Do you have any views on the legality?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> It's the same decision that our own courts made when   
   > >>>>> considering Julian Assange's extradition. He had sex with a   
   > >>>>> woman knowing that she would only consent if he used a condom.   
   > >>>>> He either removed it or tore it (so it   
   > >>>>> is alleged) and our courts have said that this could be   
   > >>>>> construed as rape.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Does it count a rape if it accidentally splits during the act...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>> It can't be because it's simply an accident and is in no way   
   > >>> intentional.   
   > >>   
   > >> Even if it was, have these women not heard of the morning after   
   > >> pill?   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > Assange's victim was mainly concerned with the possibility of having   
   > > caught a sexually transmitted disease from him. He didn't give a   
   > > shit about her worries, though. His own satisfaction took priority.   
   >   
   > I wouldn't fuck someone with a disease with a condom, just in case.   
   >   
      
   The only women that would fuck you are filled with disease, just sayin.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)