XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, uk.politics.misc, uk.legal
XPost: alt.politics.uk
From: PMD@SIBU.HQ
First-Post submitted this idea :
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:33:56 GMT, Paul Pot wrote:
>
>> First-Post expressed precisely :
>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:14:24 +0000, GB
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> British police are far less likely to get killed or injured on
>>>> duty than US police.
>>>>
>>>> 123 US officers killed in 2015 and 122 in 2014.
>>>>
>>>> 1 UK officer killed in 2015 and none in 2014.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you think that is?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Probably because it is a homogenous society (only 14% minorities)
>>> and a population of roughly 1/5th that of the US.
>>> There are over 765,000 police officers (those with arrest
>>> authority) in the US. Total law enforcement personnel of around
>>> 1.1 million within a population of over 320 million.
>>> The UK has right at 127,000 officers total.
>>> You're feebly trying to compare apples to watermelons.
>>>
>>> And US police officers actually run toward the bad guys as opposed
>>> to what those officers did.
>>> An American canine officer would have let the dog loose on the guy
>>> the second they saw the hammer. What did the female Brit canine
>>> officer do? Run away screaming taking her dog with her.
>>>
>>> Three American officers would have piled on the guy, hammer be
>>> damned. And they would have subdued him. And a female US canine
>>> officer would not have been screaming like a school girl.
>>
>> The dog should have gone in before he pulled any taser. That was
>> pathetic from the female officer. I pay my taxes for that debacle?
>
> She did indeed appear to be more of just a woman with a dog than any
> professional canine officer.
Even the dog knew it was pathetic.
--
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
