XPost: uk.politics.misc, 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: Nick.Spam@Yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On 23/01/2017 12:57, Brian Reay wrote:   
   > On 23/01/17 11:45, The Todal wrote:   
   >> On 22/01/2017 20:55, burfordTjustice wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:24:23 -0600   
   >>> "newsreader crashed again"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 22 Jan 2017 07:52 PM ,burfordTjustice    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> Missile failure off Florida? British leader won't say   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So what?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Occasional missiles fail, unlike the Buford Perfect Penetrator.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> To reveal details would contravene the OSA.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Too bad for you, the press now has a run with it...   
   >>> Please post up the part of the OSA that you refer to.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I think David Cameron ought to have made a statement in the Commons   
   >> about it and since he didn't, Theresa May should have done.   
   >   
   > Why?   
   >   
   > The whole idea of tests is to check things. If it is know systems are   
   > 'perfect' (none ever are) there is no need for tests. It is the nature   
   > of the beast that you need to test things and in some tests you will see   
   > problems. It is quite normal.   
   >   
   > This problem is being blown out of proportion.   
   >   
      
   Yes but when buying something new you should have access to testing   
   information. So that you know if the expected reliability gives value   
   for money.   
      
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)