XPost: uk.politics.misc, 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: burfordTjustice@tues.uk   
      
   On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:09:37 +0000   
   GB  wrote:   
      
   > On 23/01/2017 11:45, The Todal wrote:   
   >   
   > > But it's daft for Andrew Neil to expect Theresa May to talk about   
   > > it as an exclusive for viewers of his show.   
   >   
   > I assume that the problem was that the incorrect target coordinates   
   > were input into the missile, which is why it effectively turned left   
   > and headed for the USA, rather than right and headed over the   
   > atlantic.   
   >   
   > There's one aspect I don't understand at all.  Now, if I had been at   
   > Lockheed, designing the system for the US government, I'd have   
   > inserted some code in the missile so it simply could not be targeted   
   > at anywhere in the USA. It's simple enough - no targets west of 40   
   > degrees W or east of 150 degrees E. That way, if the Brits ever fell   
   > out with the USA, there'd be no risk to the USA from the UK nuclear   
   > deterrent.   
   >   
   > So, why was that simple precaution not taken?   
   >   
   >   
      
   Well since you know all things about missile/rockets you tell   
   us the answers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)