home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.british      The wigs are all part of the procedure      331,528 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 329,838 of 331,528   
   abelard to All   
   Re: UK Supreme Court rules parliamentary   
   24 Jan 17 14:18:04   
   
   XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: abelard3@abelard.org   
      
   On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:16:20 +0100, abelard    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:35:38 +0000, The Todal    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 24/01/2017 11:21, Judith wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:51:20 +0000, GB  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 24/01/2017 10:46, burfordTjustice wrote:   
   >>>>> Seems Brexit is dead! You were told the vote meant nothing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> More than usually nonsensical. Even by your standards.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> What an outrageous decision !!!!   
   >>>   
   >>> How can a bunch of judges who are "enemies of the people" go against the   
   wishes   
   >>> of the British people, the Daily Mail, some of the lovely people here, and   
   the   
   >>> bitch Theresa May and her right wing party who she is trying to appease.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Unless of course the Supreme Court know more about the law of the land   
   than the   
   >>> Tory Party and its supporters and this has just been a total waste of   
   money and   
   >>> time.   
   >>>   
   >>> Difficult one that.   
   >   
   >>To be fair, I think Theresa May relied on advice from her Attorney   
   >>General and from the team of government lawyers at the Treasury. I don't   
   >>suppose she knows any law at all. I'm not sure what her specialist   
   >>subject is - maybe the fauna and flora of the Swiss Alps.   
   >>   
   >>What it shows is the down-side of a government making cutbacks and   
   >>economies in government services. The in-house team of lawyers is not a   
   >>team of the brightest and best. Without wishing to be unkind, it isn't   
   >>likely that any of them would have excelled in their profession if they   
   >>had been in private practice. The Attorney General is a very mediocre   
   >>barrister who had no past experience in constitutional law. They gave   
   >>the advice that they knew their masters wanted to hear.   
   >   
   >   
   >3 to 8th of these geniuses voted that she was able   
   >8 voted no...   
   >   
   >1 more and it would be half   
   >   
   >lawyers are not the sharpest of people...   
   >   
   >they are no more sharp when they do what you want than   
   >    when they do the opposite   
      
   it is unwise to give power to the unelected   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   www.abelard.org   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca