Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 329,921 of 331,528    |
|    Ophelia to JNugent    |
|    =?utf-8?Q?Re:_British_group:_To_avoid_of    |
|    31 Jan 17 21:40:57    |
      XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc, uk.legal       XPost: alt.politics.uk       From: OphElsinore@gmail.com              "Svenne" wrote in message news:o6qv64$iar$1@dont-email.me...              On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:28:16 +0000, JNugent wrote:              > On 31/01/2017 15:51, Ophelia wrote:              >       >> Incidentally, what else do they intend to call expectant mothers?       >       > "Pregnant people" was one suggestion in the media.              Saying "Pregnant people" is speciesism and excludes those who identify as       cats or dogs or other taxa. It would be discriminatory and very       distressing for someone who identifies as a giraffe or a kangaroo to be       referred to as a "pregnant person" and a better term must be found,       "expectant being" would be a good alternative.              There is also the question of beings who are not in a strictly medical       condition of expectancy but nevertheless identify as being pregnant. They       also have the right to be called pregnant and given full pre-natal and       maternity care.              ======              Like I said ... Bonkers!                     --       http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca