XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: abelard3@abelard.org   
      
   On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:33:16 +0000, Omega  wrote:   
      
   >On 03/02/2017 13:46, GB wrote:   
   >> On 03/02/2017 13:04, Omega wrote:   
   >>> On 03/02/2017 11:20, burfordTjustice wrote   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> "...the soldier was slightly injured, and responded with five shots."   
   >>>   
   >>> And didn't kill him outright!  What the fuck was he firing, a pea   
   >>> shooter?   
   >>   
   >> He only hit him once out of the five. The police in the UK use expanding   
   >> ammunition - effectively dum dum bullets. These are banned on the   
   >> battlefield, so the soldier would have been using solid bullets, which   
   >> are less likely to be lethal.   
      
   >Thank you, I hadn't read, that he missed four times, out of his five shots.   
   >   
   >Heat of the moment and little time to think aside, it does concern me   
   >four bullets went elsewhere other than the target, in, a reportedly,   
   >busy indoor Mall.   
      
   they obviously need more practice...   
      
   >Thankfully no other harmed?   
      
      
      
   --   
   www.abelard.org   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)