XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: PMD@SIBU.HQ   
      
   burfordTjustice wrote on 2/4/2017 :   
   > On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:05:20 GMT   
   > Paul Pot  wrote:   
   >   
   >> After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :   
   >>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 23:17:57 GMT   
   >>> Paul Pot  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :   
   >>>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 20:50:19 GMT   
   >>>>> Paul Pot  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> burfordTjustice expressed precisely :   
   >>>>>>    
   >>>>>> Please don't post that rag in here, there is a boycott on in   
   >>>>>> some sectors.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Do tell what exactly in the story was not true?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The story is irrelevant in this matter.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> So the story stands as printed as you could not provide   
   >>> any untruth.   
   >>   
   >> It's not about the story, it's about the source.   
   >>   
   >   
   > The story is true as evidenced by you not showing an untruth   
   > therefore the source is reliable.   
      
   No-one in their right mind thinks your source is credible.   
      
   --   
   Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)