Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 330,432 of 331,528    |
|    burfordTjustice to All    |
|    headline read =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CIt?= sh    |
|    22 Mar 17 16:39:40    |
      XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc       XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: burfordTjustice@tues.uk              WTF People???               headline read “It should be illegal to be a stay-at-home mum”              According to a new American study, stay-at-home moms are worth a $143,102       paycheck. But an Australian columnist didn’t take that into consideration       for her latest piece.              Sarrah Le Marquand, editor at RendezView and Stellar, describes herself as a       “mum of two” in her Twitter bio. But that didn’t keep her from writing       on what she called the “one issue guaranteed to trigger hysteria”:       stay-at-home moms. Nor did it        stop her from demanding the government mandate that mothers work – in the       name of “gender equality.”              On Monday, her column’s headline read “It should be illegal to be a       stay-at-home mum” on RendezView, a controversial news site which boasts       millions of readers, and the Daily Telegraph. “Dear mothers,” the caption       to one photo commanded, “Get        out of the kitchen and get back to work.”                     http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/katie-yoder/2017/03/22/       u-column-demands-stay-home-moms-be-illegal              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca