Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 330,620 of 331,528    |
|    Norman Wells to Graham T    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Canada=e2=80=99s_National_    |
|    05 Apr 17 21:09:29    |
      XPost: alt.home.repair, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc       XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: hex@unseen.ac.am              On 05/04/2017 20:54, Graham T wrote:       > On 05/04/2017 20:22, Norman Wells wrote:       >> On 05/04/2017 10:41, burfordTjustice wrote:       >>> Canada’s National Anthem May Go Gender-Neutral       >>>       >>> A bill is advancing through the Canadian Parliament to alter the words       >>> of the Canadian national anthem to be more “inclusive” by stripping it       >>> of gendered language.       >>       >> Good. With luck we'll be next to improve our dreadful dirge. Maybe we       >> should also introduce some political correctness, and remove outdated       >> concepts, inaccuracies and debatable points:       >>       >> Someone save our possibly gracious monarch       >> Long live our possibly noble monarch       >> Someone save the monarch       >> Send himherit victorious, happy and glorious       >> Long to live beside us       >> Someone save the monarch.       >>       >> There. It may need a bit more work, but it's a definite improvement       >> already.       >       > Can we keep the verses which go on about kicking the shit out of the Scots?              You mean the bit about 'may he sedition hush and like a torrent rush,       rebellious Scots to crush'?              Only if you think it has resonance today.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca