XPost: aus.politics, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc
XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk
From: gordon@address.invalid
James Harris wrote:
>On 07/04/2017 10:10, Gordon Levi wrote:
>> Handsome Jack wrote:
>>
>>> Gordon Levi posted
>>>> James Harris wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course. Sensible boosting of trade helps all sides.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it's good for Australia but will the removal of the European free
>>>> market help the U.K? I note at least two large corporations have
>>>> already moved their European office out of England.
>>>
>>> Really, which two are these, and when did this happen?
>>
>> I'm sorry, I got carried away. I doubt if any large corporation could
>> have completed the move in such a short time. Worse still, the only
>> one I actually remembered, Lloyds, is only moving some of its staff
>> from London to Brussels.
>
>I am pro Brexit but welcome British firms setting up offices on the
>continent because that can mean keeping the UK free of the EU regulatory
>restrictions that would be associated with 'passports' or 'equivalence'.
>Second to being able to make our own trade deals, regaining regulatory
>freedom is probably the best way for us to increase our future prosperity.
I am also pro Brexit because I think the U.K. does not deserve to be
in the E.U. There has always been the British attitude that "wogs
begin at Calais". I think sending the anti-EU advocate, Nigel Farage,
to represent the U.K in the European Parliament is so insulting that I
would have expelled them if I had the power.
As for trade deals, you had full access to the common market and you
have thrown it away. It is unlikely that the U.K. alone can negotiate
better trade deals than those that are negotiated by the E.U.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
