Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 330,736 of 331,528    |
|    Ned Latham to Nightjar    |
|    Re: MOAB    |
|    15 Apr 17 06:32:30    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz              Nightjar wrote:       > Ned Latham wrote:       > ....       >> Supposedly, MOAB is an acronym, standing for "Massive Ordinace Air Blast:.       >       > Which is what the weapon is. There is discussion over which is the best       > way to deal with a cave system - an air blast weapon, blanket bombing,       > or guided bunker buster bombs. However, if you want to give POTUS a       > publicity opportunity, choose the MOAB, which has never been used in       > action before.              Nowhere near massive enough to be effective as an air blast weapon       against underground assets that are anything like well built. That's       why the Tallboy and Grand Slam were designed to penetrate deep into       the ground before exploding. It causes a local earthquake.              A big enough air blast will punch a cavern flat if it and the target       are both near enough to ground zero, but the power required is       disproportionate: with all but nuclear weapons, the target needs       to be only a few tens of metres away, because the blast deflects       along the ground. As I said, a gas bomb delivers much more bang for       the buck (as an air blast weapon).              MOAB is a misnomer. It should be called what it is. Maybe then it       would get used correctly.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca