Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 330,743 of 331,528    |
|    Ned Latham to Nightjar    |
|    Re: MOAB    |
|    15 Apr 17 10:46:33    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz              Nightjar wrote:       > Ned Latham wrote:       > > Nightjar wrote:       > > > Ned Latham wrote:       > > > ....       > > > > Supposedly, MOAB is an acronym, standing for       > > > > "Massive Ordinace Air Blast".       > > >       > > > Which is what the weapon is. There is discussion over which is the best       > > > way to deal with a cave system - an air blast weapon, blanket bombing,       > > > or guided bunker buster bombs. However, if you want to give POTUS a       > > > publicity opportunity, choose the MOAB, which has never been used in       > > > action before.       > >       > > Nowhere near massive enough to be effective as an air blast weapon       > > against underground assets that are anything like well built. That's       > > why the Tallboy and Grand Slam were designed to penetrate deep into       > > the ground before exploding. It causes a local earthquake.       > >       > > A big enough air blast will punch a cavern flat if it and the target       > > are both near enough to ground zero, but the power required is       > > disproportionate: with all but nuclear weapons, the target needs       > > to be only a few tens of metres away, because the blast deflects       > > along the ground. As I said, a gas bomb delivers much more bang for       > > the buck (as an air blast weapon).       > >       > > MOAB is a misnomer. It should be called what it is. Maybe then it       > > would get used correctly.       >       > I think you are missing my point. The weapon was almost certainly chosen       > not for its effectiveness, but for its publicity value. Donald Trump is       > sending a message both to the world and to his supporters.              Mmm, okay. Point taken. I remain surprised that a target more in       keeping wuth the bomb's nature wasn't selected, but then I don't       even know whether there *is* one in Aghanistan.              Ned              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca