Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 330,745 of 331,528    |
|    Graham T to Ned Latham    |
|    Re: MOAB    |
|    15 Apr 17 12:28:14    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: removethistocontactmepower354@talktalk.net              On 15/04/2017 12:12, Ned Latham wrote:       > burfordTjustice wrote:       >> Nightjar wrote:       >>> Ned Latham wrote:       >>>> Nightjar wrote:       >>>>> Ned Latham wrote:       >>>>> ....       >>>>>> Supposedly, MOAB is an acronym, standing for "Massive Ordinace       >>>>>> Air Blast:.       >>>>>       >>>>> Which is what the weapon is. There is discussion over which is the       >>>>> best way to deal with a cave system - an air blast weapon, blanket       >>>>> bombing, or guided bunker buster bombs. However, if you want to       >>>>> give POTUS a publicity opportunity, choose the MOAB, which has       >>>>> never been used in action before.       >>>>       >>>> Nowhere near massive enough to be effective as an air blast weapon       >>>> against underground assets that are anything like well built. That's       >>>> why the Tallboy and Grand Slam were designed to penetrate deep into       >>>> the ground before exploding. It causes a local earthquake.       >>>>       >>>> A big enough air blast will punch a cavern flat if it and the target       >>>> are both near enough to ground zero, but the power required is       >>>> disproportionate: with all but nuclear weapons, the target needs       >>>> to be only a few tens of metres away, because the blast deflects       >>>> along the ground. As I said, a gas bomb delivers much more bang for       >>>> the buck (as an air blast weapon).       >>>>       >>>> MOAB is a misnomer. It should be called what it is. Maybe then it       >>>> would get used correctly.       >>>       >>> I think you are missing my point. The weapon was almost certainly       >>> chosen not for its effectiveness, but for its publicity value. Donald       >>> Trump is sending a message both to the world and to his supporters.       >>       >> Clearly you are clueless, Trump did not approve the dropping of       >> the MOAB.       >       > What gives you that idea?       >       >> His prior approval was not needed.       >       > If Trump didn't order it for the political reason that Nightjar       > suggested, the question arises as to why was it used at all.       > As a purely military excercise, the use of MOAB to kill a few       > snipers is an extremely expensive absurdity.       >       > Ned       >              The idea was to put the shits up IS with a great big bang. Even 90 dead       is not good VFM.                            ---       This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.       https://www.avast.com/antivirus              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca