Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.british    |    The wigs are all part of the procedure    |    331,528 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 331,087 of 331,528    |
|    Topaz to All    |
|    Re: For the Grammer police(Nazis) (1/2)    |
|    22 May 17 20:37:35    |
      XPost: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc       XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk       From: mars1933@hotmail.com              England's Guilt       by Joseph Goebbels              It is a major error to assume that England's plutocrats slipped into       the war against their will or even against their intentions. The       opposite is true. The English warmongers wanted the war and used all       the resources at their disposal over the years to bring it about. They       surely were not surprised by the war. English plutocracy had no goal       other than to unleash war against Germany at the right moment, and       this since Germany first began to seek once again to be a world power.       Poland really had little to do with the outbreak of war between the       Reich and England. It was only a means to an end. England did not       support the Polish government out of principle or for humanitarian       reasons. That is clear from the fact that England gave Poland no help       of any kind whatsoever when the war began. Nor did England take any       measures against Russia. The opposite, in fact. The London warring       clique to this day has tried to bring Russia into the campaign of       aggression against Germany.              The encirclement of Germany long before the outbreak of the war was       traditional English policy. From the beginning, England has always       directed its main military might against Germany. It never could       tolerate a strong Reich on the Continent. It justified its policy by       claiming that it wanted to maintain a balance of forces in Europe.              Today there is still another reason. The English warmongers conceal       it. It is crassly egotistic. The English prime minister announced the       day the war began that England's goal was to destroy Hitlerism.       However, he defined Hitlerism in a way other than how the English       plutocracy actually sees it. The English warmongers claim that       National Socialism wants to conquer the world. No nation is secure       against German aggression. An end must be made of the German hunger       for power. The limit came in the conflict with Poland. In reality,       however, there is another reason for England's war with Germany. The       English warmongers cannot seriously claim that Germany wants to       conquer the world, particularly in view of the fact that England       controls nearly two thirds of the world. And Germany since 1933 has       never threatened English interests.              So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in       this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is       speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees       Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn       in the eye of English plutocracy.              England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people's       state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest       land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact       the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of       this wealth. We see in England an army of millions of impoverished,       socially enslaved and oppressed people. Child labor is still a matter       of course there. They have only heard about social welfare programs.       Parliament occasionally discusses social legislation. Nowhere else is       there such terrible and horrifying inequality as in the English slums.       Those with good breeding take no notice of it. Should anyone speak of       it in public, the press, which serves plutocratic democracy, quickly       brands him the worst kind of rascal. They do not hesitate from making       major changes in the Constitution if they are necessary to preserve       capitalist democracy.              Capitalism democracy suffers from every possible modern social       ailment. The Lords and City people can remain the richest people one       earth only because they constantly maintain their wealth by exploiting       their colonies and preserving unbelievable poverty in their own       country.              Germany, on the other hand, has based its domestic policies on new and       modern social principles. That is why it is a danger to English       plutocracy. It is also why English capitalists want to destroy       Hitlerism. They see Hitlerism as all the generous social reforms that       have occurred in Germany since 1933. The English plutocrats rightly       fear that good things are contagious, that they could endanger English       capitalism.       That is why England declared war on Germany. Since it was accustomed       to letting others fight its wars, it looked to the European continent       to find those ready to fight for England's interests. France was ready       to take on this degrading duty, since the same kind of people ruled       France. They too were ready for war out of egotistic reasons. Western       European democracy is really only a Western European plutocracy that       rules the world. It declared war on German socialism because it       endangered their capitalist interests.       A similar drama began in 1914. England had more luck during those four       and a half years than it is having today. Europe's nations had no       chance to see what was happening. The nations of Europe today have no       desire to play the same role they played during the World War. England       and France stand alone. Still, England is trying once again to wage       war without making any personal sacrifice. The goal is to blockade       Germany, to gradually bring it to submit by starvation. That is       longstanding English policy. They used it successfully in the       Napoleonic wars, and also during the World War. It would work now as       well, if the German people had not been educated by National       Socialism. National Socialism is immune to English temptations.       English propaganda lies no longer work in Germany. They have gradually       lost their effectiveness in the rest of the world as well, since       German propaganda today reaches far beyond its borders. This time,       English plutocracy will not succeed in driving a wedge between the       German people and their leadership, though that is their goal.              The German nation today is defending not only its honor and       independence, but also the great social accomplishments it has made       through hard and untiring work since 1933. It is a people's state       built on the foundation of justice and economic good sense. In the       past, England always had the advantage of facing a fragmented Germany.       It is only natural that English plutocracy today seeks to split the       German people and make it ripe for new collapse.              English lying propaganda can no longer name things by their proper       names. It therefore claims that it is not fighting the German people,       only Hitlerism. But we know this old song. In South Africa, England       was not fighting the Boers, only Krugerism. In the World War, England       wanted to destroy Kaiserism, not the German people. But that did not       stop English plutocracy from brutally and relentlessly suppressing the       Boers after that war or the Germans after our defeat.              A child once burned is twice shy. The German people were once victims       of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca