XPost: alt.home.repair, alt.politics.scorched-earth, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.legal, alt.politics.uk   
   From: Big_Jumper@gmail.com   
      
   On 26/05/2017 11:54, burfordTjustice wrote:   
   > LOL  no surprise there, is there?   
   >   
   > Surprise, surprise. Men who are physically weak are more likely to   
   > favor socialist policies.   
   >   
   > An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171   
   men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep   
   circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income   
   inequality. The study,    
   published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker   
   men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.   
   >   
   >   Brunel University's Michael Price believes this may be a product of   
   evolutionary psychology.   
   >   
   > "This is about our Stone Age brains, in a modern society," said Dr. Price.   
   "Our minds evolved in environments where strength was a big determinant of   
   success. If you find yourself in a body not threatened by other males, if you   
   feel you can win    
   competitions for status, then maybe you start thinking inequality is pretty   
   good."   
   >   
   > Taking his assessment one step further, Price wanted to factor in gym time   
   to see if he could determine the relationship flow between strength and   
   socialistic leanings. Are men who are naturally strong more inclined to hold   
   capitalistic views, or are    
   men with capitalistic views driven to go to the gym?   
   >   
   > "When Dr Price factored in time spent in the gym some, but not all, of the   
   link disappeared," notes The Times, suggesting there may be something to men   
   with capitalistic views hitting the gym.   
   >   
   >   "Of course this isn’t rational in modern environments, where your   
   ability to win might have more to do with where you went to university. Lot of   
   guys who are phenomenally successful in modern societies would probably be   
   nowhere near as successful    
   in hunter gatherer societies," added Price.   
   >   
   > Other studies in the past have also suggested stronger men are more   
   right-wing than physically weaker men. "Researchers found that men's opinions   
   on redistribution of wealth could be predicted by their upper body strength,   
   with powerful men more likely    
   to take a conservative stance of protecting their own interests," noted The   
   Telegraph of a 2013 study from Aarhus University in Denmark.   
   >   
   > Anyone with two eyes would be hard-pressed to refute such findings.   
   >   
      
   Bollocks !   
      
   Consider that men in blue collar trades are and used to be built like   
   brick shithouses, and were socialists.  While the white collar office   
   staff were Tories.   
      
   ---   
   This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.   
   https://www.avast.com/antivirus   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)