XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, uk.politics.misc, uk.legal   
   XPost: alt.politics.uk   
   From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
   Will Whites Commit Race Suicide?   
      
   Indigenous Britons will be a minority by 2100. John Morse asks: Have   
   our people the will to survive?   
      
   The White Race is headed for minority status, not just on a global   
   scale but in its own homelands. Alarmism from the far right? No,   
   statistically verifiable reality supported by official figures.   
      
   Governments, academic demographers and the UN are all agreed on the   
   trends. Immigration and differential birth rates between Whites and   
   non-Whites speak for themselves. If they remain as they are, people of   
   European descent will be outnumbered practically everywhere before the   
   end of the 21st century.   
      
   Much as our rulers want to keep the facts under wraps and, as far as   
   possible, away from the public gaze, those facts are nevertheless   
   fully acknowledged by those in the know.   
      
   In what ought to be a wake-up call to the British people, Anthony   
   Browne, writing in the left-wing Observer (3rd September 2000) under   
   the blaring headline "The last days of the white world" outlined the   
   situation. The trick, it seems, is to present he matter as if it were   
   no big deal. Said Browne, speaking of shifting population balances in   
   America:   
      
   'It was news and non-news: the most significant milestone in one of   
   the most profound changes to affect the US in the past century, and   
   yet a non-event. Last week the US Census Bureau issued figures showing   
   that non-Hispanic Whites made up 49.8 per cent of the population of   
   California. Anglo-Saxon Whites are already a minority in Hawaii and   
   the District of Columbia. Now they are a minority in the country's   
   most populous state, the one most usually identified with American   
   dream.'   
      
   Only 30 years ago 80 per cent of California's population was white.   
   Immigration, said Browne, is at its highest rates since the early   
   1900s. It is of course a fact that most migration into the state at   
   that time was white, including Europeans entering the United States   
   and residents moving there from elsewhere in the country (though there   
   was an Oriental influx at about the same time).   
      
   But all this has changed since the Immigration Act passed through the   
   US Congress in the mid-1960s. This served to shut out most Europeans   
   from America, whilst controls on non-white immigrants have lapsed   
   piecemeal ever since. When the suicidally low birth-rates of   
   California's white residents is factored into the equation, it is not   
   hard to see how the state's black, Asian and Latin American mestizo   
   populations have managed to rise by almost a third since 1990 alone,   
   whilst the number of non-Hispanic Whites has fallen by 3 per cent over   
   the same period.   
      
   Browne affirmed the significance of this. "Where California goes, the   
   rest of America is predicted to follow," he wrote. "At present, 72 per   
   cent of the US population is non-Hispanic Whites: the US Census Bureau   
   predicts they will become a minority between 2055 and 2060."   
   Worldwide trend.   
      
   In fact, what is happening at such a pace in the United States, where   
   the speed of demographic change is so dramatic and so visible, in   
   Browne's words "only reflects wider and highly controversial changes   
   elsewhere in the world."   
      
   "Controversy", of course, is something that has been deliberately   
   engineered around this topic. The last thing the powers-that-be in the   
   New World Order want the peoples of European stock to be thinking   
   about is their true predicament. As Browne remarked, here is "an area   
   in which few demographers dare to tread for fear of being accused of   
   racism."   
      
   One academic (presumably British) whom Browne interviewed even told   
   him: "You cannot quote me - a word out of place and I get crapped on   
   from a very great height... Whatever you say you are deemed racist!"   
      
   The "inevitability" trick   
   To Whites, this situation is presented in terms of two propositions:   
   first, that their becoming a minority does not matter (or is even to   
   be welcomed); second, that there is nothing they can do about it   
   anyway.   
      
   Both are lies.   
   For ordinary workaday Britons, not just in London but throughout the   
   nation, the ethnic transformation of their country is an unmitigated   
   disaster, It spells dispossession - dispossession perhaps of one's   
   job, certainly of one's neighbourhood, maybe even of the home in which   
   one has spent one's life. It spells the end of security - as all sense   
   of coherent community collapses in a social environment made up of   
   people too innately different from one another to form a like-minded   
   population capable of pulling together in a single direction. Very   
   likely, the end result will be a number of communities at war with   
   each other in an overcrowded land. Meanwhile crime explodes at a level   
   once unheard of. If one has a family to consider, and children to be   
   schooled locally in the state system, there is only one realistic   
   option left. One must get out. Hence the phenomenon of "white flight"   
   from London and the big cities.   
      
   The final condition of Britain would rather resemble that of most   
   Central and South American tinpot republics, where a white - or   
   relatively white - ruling caste lords it over a mish-mash of Indians,   
   Negroes and half-breeds (although nobody's racial credentials are   
   guaranteed in such societies). The attitude of the rulers is   
   exploitative and parasitical because they have no sense of kinship   
   with their subjects. That of the latter is servile, punctuated without   
   breaks of violent rebellion as they intermittently react against their   
   subjection. These countries are really mini-empires, in which the mass   
   of the populace is policed and managed as if they were colonial   
   inferiors rather than treated as kindred citizens, albeit of different   
   rank, sharing a common nationality with their leaders. Nor, given the   
   racial differences within those populations, can things be otherwise.   
   Such states are not noted for their strength, stability, harmony or   
   prosperity. For instance, in terms of land area Brazil is larger than   
   the United States (apart from Alaska), Its natural resources are vast,   
   Its population is close to 150 million. about the same as that of the   
   US circa World War II. In theory, Brazil ought to be a world power. In   
   fact, it is a basket case. It would of course be "racist" to suggest   
   that this might have something to with its predominantly mixed-race   
   populace.   
      
   But it is just such a state that our rulers are apparently quite happy   
   to see Britain become!   
      
   Racial suicide, for this is what this policy amounts to - is not a   
   painless process. Many former white civilisations, from Greece and   
   Rome onwards, have committed it, None has benefited by it.   
      
   Dissenting voice   
      
   One dissenting voice mentioned in Brown's article was that of BNP   
   Chairman Nick Griffin, quoted as saying: "I don't think there's any   
   doubt that, within this century, white people will become a minority   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)