XPost: misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns, or.politics   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: democrat-parasites@latimes.com   
      
   Elizabeth Warren, who ended her White House campaign Thursday,   
   claimed “she’d win the nomination because ‘she persisted.’?” Yet   
   that persistence, gibes The Washington Post’s Henry Olsen, cost   
   her and Bernie Sanders their “best chance” for the Democratic   
   nomination. Warren was “effectively a niche candidate of the   
   chardonnay left” — which only worked while “the moderate lane   
   was fractured” among several candidates. When Democratic   
   moderates “coalesced around” Joe Biden, Warren should have bowed   
   out, as Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg did. She could have   
   then endorsed Sanders, uniting progressives behind their “clear   
   leader” — which would have markedly improved Sanders’ Super   
   Tuesday showing and boosted her chances of becoming his running   
   mate. Instead, she let her “persistence” become “stubbornness,”   
   and now she is “just another losing presidential wannabe.” Quips   
   Olsen: “I doubt she has a plan for how to deal with that.”   
       
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)