Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.clinton    |    Slick Willy and his even slicker wife    |    65,031 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 63,525 of 65,031    |
|    Jack Fake to All    |
|    Justice Department investigating Harvard    |
|    16 Mar 21 02:19:48    |
      XPost: misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns, or.politics       XPost: alt.politics.liberalism       From: noham@nospam.com              The Department of Justice is investigating Harvard University       over its admissions policies and blasting the university for       stonewalling its efforts.              In a letter dated Nov. 17, the Justice Department threatened to       sue Harvard over its “delays and challenges” in producing       documents related to the federal agency’s investigation into       civil rights violations.              According to the letter, the probe is related to a 2014 lawsuit       that claims Harvard limits the number of Asian-Americans it       admits each year. Justice Department officials have been meeting       and corresponding with Harvard’s attorneys on this issue since       early September.              “In the intervening two months, Harvard has pursued a strategy       of delay and has not yet produced even a single document,” wrote       Matthew J. Donnelly, an attorney in the department’s civil       rights division.              The Justice Department’s Nov. 17 correspondence to Harvard was       first reported in The Wall Street Journal Tuesday.              While the letter is unclear about exactly what documents the       Justice Department has requested, it notes that Harvard has       already produced some of the information in the 2014 lawsuit. A       judge has ordered Harvard to submit admissions data by race,       grade point average, SAT scores, legacy, and other criteria for       the past six years.              Harvard will comply with its legal requirements, but it has “an       obligation to protect the confidentiality of student and       applicant files and other highly sensitive records, and we have       been seeking to engage the Department of Justice in the best       means of doing so,” the university said in a statement Tuesday.              Harvard’s attorneys in letters to the Justice Department have       also questioned why the agency, led by Attorney General Jeff       Sessions, is opening up a probe into a complaint about       admissions that is more than 2˝ years old and one that already       involves a lawsuit in progress.              “The opening of an investigation in the current circumstances       is, to our understanding, so outside ordinary circumstances that       Harvard is obliged to clarify the authority and rationale for       the Department’s decision,” Seth Waxman, an attorney with       WilmerHale who is representing Harvard, wrote in an Oct. 6       letter.              Students for Fair Admissions, a nonprofit whose members include       students and parents, filed the lawsuit. The suit said the       university’s admissions practices violate federal civil rights       law and asked a federal judge to bar Harvard from using race as       an admissions factor in undergraduate admissions.              Edward Blum, with Students for Fair Admissions, said he is       gratified that the Justice Department has launched an       investigation into Harvard’s admissions practices.              “Harvard’s Asian quotas, and the overall racial balancing that       follows, have been ignored by our federal agencies for too       long,” Blum said in a statement. “This investigation is a       welcome development.”              Earlier this year, the New York Times reported that the US       Justice Department, under President Trump, was preparing to       redirect resources from its civil rights division toward       investigating and suing universities over affirmative action       policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants.              In August, the Trump administration said it was looking into the       complaint against Harvard, sparking worry in academia and among       civil rights advocates.              This year, Harvard admitted 22.2 percent of students who       identified as Asian, about the same as last year.              Blum has a similar case pending against the University of North       Carolina at Chapel Hill. And he also pushed a case brought by       Abigail Fisher, a student who said the University of Texas       rejected her because she is white.              However, the Justice Department in the past has said it is only       investigating one university on the matter.              Harvard has said previously that its admissions practices are       consistent with legal precedents set by the Supreme Court.              Just last year, the US Supreme Court, in a 4-to-3 vote, ruled       that college admissions officers could continue to use race as       one of several factors in deciding who gets into a school. The       decision surprised university officials and disappointed those       who had hoped to end race-based admissions.              But the ruling does require universities, if they are       challenged, to show they had no choice but to use race to create       diversity on campus and that other factors alone, such as family       income or an advantage to first-generation college students,       couldn’t create a similar mix of students, according to Vinay       Harpalani, a law professor at the Savannah Law School who       specializes in affirmative action.              A more active Justice Department on this front could push       schools to demonstrate that they are looking at other factors       before race, Harpalani said.              “Universities typically don’t like to make details on their race-       conscious policies public because the line between legal and       illegal policies is not fully clear . . . and because there are       always potential lawsuits out there, and also because this is       such a politically charged issue,” Harpalani said earlier this       year.              The Justice Department has given Harvard until Dec. 1 to comply       with the document request or may file a lawsuit to enforce the       university’s compliance, according to the letter.              Still no word on whether Harvard can ever produce Obama's       transcripts or any papers he wrote there.              https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/11/21/justice-department-       investigating-harvard-over-its-admission-       policies/LJL8KmnOZHY3qO0PjCU8LP/story.htm       l?p1=Article_Trending_Most_Viewed                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca