Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.clinton    |    Slick Willy and his even slicker wife    |    65,031 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 63,630 of 65,031    |
|    Jimmy Galligan to All    |
|    A hate crime is a hate crime no matter w    |
|    04 Jun 21 08:59:28    |
      XPost: alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       XPost: talk.politics.medicine       From: athletics@vanguard.edu              There’s no doubt Grafton Thomas committed a hate crime when he       allegedly stabbed five people at a Hanukkah party in New York.       He is an African American. There was a time when the two, a hate       crime, and African American, were not only mutually exclusive       but almost unthinkable. There was good reason. In the long vile,       hideous history of racially motivated hate violence in America,       African Americans have been the prime targets.              The legions of statutes, photos and various exhibits that depict       gruesome lynching scenes and mob violence against African       Americans at the National Memorial for Peace and Justice in       Montgomery, Alabama is gory testimony to that. But even before       Thomas welded his machete at the Hanukkah party in New York that       had changed.              While Thomas’s attack is a grotesque and extreme example of hate       violence, it is hardly an aberration. Whites are the targets of       racially motivated attacks by blacks. True, some of the attacks       against whites by blacks are for their money and valuables.       Others are revenge assaults by blacks for real or imagined       racial insults. It is equally true that most violent crimes       against whites are committed by other whites, while most violent       crimes against blacks are committed by other blacks.              Yet even after discounting crimes that are hastily and       erroneously tagged as racially motivated, many blacks do attack       whites because they are white. Justice Department studies have       shown that a measurable number of the hate crimes examined were       committed against whites by black attackers. The Southern       Poverty Law Center which for decades has tracked hate violence       in America notes that cases of black-on-white violence has been       more than an aberration in the last two decades.              More than a few ultra-conservative websites, bloggers, and the       usual motley collection of white supremacists and rightist       extremist groups have jumped all over this and screamed long and       loud that racial hate now comes with a black face. This does       several things. It puts the finger-point on blacks as America’s       major hate mongers. It feeds into America’s gun mania by       igniting loud calls for fearful whites to arm and protect       themselves from lawless blacks. But most of all, it presents the       false narrative that racially motivated hate violence is a grim       product of a long bygone past, and that whatever hate violence       remains is perpetuated by blacks.              This lie has worked. Who better than Trump to prove it? He took       much heat in November 2015, for his false, gross factually       challenged and deliberately inflammatory retweet of a favorite       white nationalist talking point about black on white crime. Said       Trump, whites were in grave peril from being murdered by blacks,       and the stats supposedly proved that. The figures were quickly       debunked. It didn’t matter. The lie was out there and countless       numbers believed it.              Trump’s racist bombast could get zero media and public traction       if there weren’t just enough white victims and, now as the       attack on the Hanukkah party showed, Jewish victims of black       hate violence to make these fallacious claims seem plausible.       That’s stirred a kind of reverse prickliness on the part of many       blacks. The reaction has been either disbelief that blacks can       commit a hate crime. Or, there’s the complaint that when blacks       do commit a hate crime and whites are the victims, the media       blows it to the sky and federal hate crime charges are quickly       slapped on the black offender. The charge is that there’s a       double standard in how the media and public perceives and reacts       to black violence against whites as opposed to white violence       against blacks. Thus, there is little outcry or condemnation of       it by blacks. Civil rights leaders and organizations, yes, but       blacks in general, no.              Worse, some blacks quietly shrug off the violence with the       bitter remark that whites have been killing blacks for years and       getting away with it, and that there has been no massive       explosion of white outrage at the lax treatment of white killers.              The deafening silence by blacks on this apparent racial outrage       against whites will draw shouts from some that blacks are       hypocrites and have a double standard when victims are whites.       They’re not totally wrong. The victims of Thomas’s rampage were       innocents who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong       time and were stabbed because they were white.              Blacks must mourn these murders as passionately as they do those       of black victims of white attacks and just as passionately call       for the harshest punishment of the killer. The great strength of              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca