Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.clinton    |    Slick Willy and his even slicker wife    |    65,031 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 63,637 of 65,031    |
|    Biden Hid In The Basement to All    |
|    CNN Can't Dodge Alan Dershowitz Libel Su    |
|    04 Jun 21 09:54:50    |
      XPost: alt.crime, alt.politics.democrats, alt.news-media       XPost: misc.survivalism       From: coward-biden@gmail.com              Alan Dershowitz will be able to move to discovery after       surviving the first round of a defamation lawsuit against CNN       over its coverage of Donald Trump’s impeachment.              The famed attorney was representing Trump in the 2020 Senate       trial when he answered a question from Ted Cruz about whether a       president can be impeached and removed from office if he takes       any action that is motivated by a desire to be reelected.       Dershowitz gave a lengthy response that concluded, “Every public       official that I know believes that his election is in the public       interest and, mostly you are right, your election is in the       public interest, and if a president does something which he       believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that       cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”              Later, discussing that moment from the impeachment trial, Joe       Lockhart appeared on CNN and discussed Dershowitz’ “absurd”       views that he believed a president had “license to commit       crimes” if it’s better for the country.              “The Dershowitz Doctrine would make presidents immune from every       criminal act, so long as they could plausibly claim they did it       to boost their re-election effort,” added Paul Begala, another       politico pro turned CNN pundit. “Campaign finance laws: out the       window. Bribery statutes: gone. Extortion: no more.”              In his libel claim, Dershowitz alleges CNN provided an edited       version of what he said and a misleading narrative about his       views that damaged his reputation as a scholar. He’s seeking       $300 million in damages.              CNN, in a motion to dismiss, argued that it was protected by the       fair report privilege, which shields the press from reporting       about government proceedings.              U.S. District Court Raag Singhal agrees with Dershowitz that a       misleading presentation cancels out such a defense.              “CNN presented an abridgment of Dershowitz’ answer to Senator       Cruz’ question,” he writes. “The abridgment is not accurate, to       the extent that it omitted a crucial qualification: that an       illegal motive for a quid pro quo would be corrupt. As a result,       the commentators’ statements – that Dershowitz believes a       President can do anything, even commit crimes if it would help       his re-election – are not based upon a fair and accurate summary       of Dershowitz’ statement to the Senate.”              The judge takes CNN’s point that journalists have discretion and       aren’t obligated to present all information that puts its       subject in a positive light, but still concludes that CNN fell       short of a standard of fairness.              CNN argued there were other grounds to dismiss the complaint       including that the allegedly defamatory statements were opinions       and there was nothing to support actual malice. On the former,       Singhal sees the statements as mixed opinions with some factual       foundation that could be challenged as false. On the latter       front, even though the judge strikes Dershowitz’ allegation of       political animus, he rules there’s enough at this stage.       Accepting what’s pled as true, as judges must do in federal       court on a motion to dismiss, Singhal points to the aspects of       Dershowitz complaint alleging CNN had knowledge of his qualified       views on the topic of unlawful actions by a president.              Singhal adds, “Whether the evidence adduced will ultimately       satisfy Dershowitz’ burden of proving actual malice by clear and       convincing evidence remains to be seen. But he has alleged       enough to go forward.”              See the full opinion below…              https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/cnn-cant-dodge-alan-       dershowitz-libel-suit-1234958859/                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca