Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.clinton    |    Slick Willy and his even slicker wife    |    65,031 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 64,970 of 65,031    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Journalist claims Washington Post should    |
|    15 Apr 25 08:13:31    |
      XPost: alt.journalism.criticism, alt.journalism.newspapers, alt.       an.rush-limbaugh       XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns       From: yourdime@outlook.com              Investigative journalist Seamus Bruner on Monday stated that he believes       the Washington Post should give back its coveted Pulitzer Prize on a now-       debunked story about Russia's supposed collusion with President Donald       Trump's 2016 campaign.              Just The News last week exclusively obtained and shared nearly 700 pages       of once-secret documents related to the FBI's investigation into the       collusion allegations. Those documents included proof that former National       Security Agency Director Mike Rogers told FBI agents that the crux of a       Pulitzer Prize award-winning Washington Post story on the Russia collusion       hoax was “wrong."              Bruner told "Just the News, No Noise" that he believes the revelation       means the Washington Post should give its Pulitzer Prize back or renounce       the award. He also indicated that the New York Times should give its award       back for its coverage of the story.              "They totally should give it back," Bruner said. "And it's just such a       shame what's happened to the Pulitzer Committee. It used to mean something       to win a Pulitzer, and ever since 2016 I've watched year after year they       give Pulitzers to total disinformation. I remember the New York Times also       got a Pulitzer for its Russia reporting, which was totally wrong."              The Pulitzer Prize Board's website said the 2018 Pulitzer Prize in       National Reporting was awarded to the staffs of the Washington Post and       New York Times “for deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the       public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of       Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections       to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team, and his       eventual administration.”              It is not clear whether the Washington Post had been told prior to the May       2017 publishing of their story that Rogers was denying their       characterization of his talk with Trump.              https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/journalist-claims-washington-       post-should-give-back-its-pulitzer-story-russia              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca