XPost: talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness, free.christians, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: wooly51@comcast.net   
      
   On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:28:23 GMT, HeatWave    
   wrote:   
      
   snip   
      
   >If there was no Creator, then life must have started spontaneously by   
   >chance.  Do you deny this? or is it another straw man. For life to have   
   >come about, somehow the right chemicals would have had to come together   
   >in the right quantities, under the right temperature and pressure and   
   >other controlling factors, and all would have had to be maintained for   
   >the correct length of time. Furthermore, for life to have begun and been   
   >sustained on earth, these chance events would have had to be repeated   
   >thousands of times. But how likely is it for even one such event to take   
   >place?   
      
      Holy shit. Argument from incredibility, I haven't heard that one   
   for at least three seconds.   
      
      Evolution is a done deal. Abiogenists is subject matter and it   
   follows that one follows the other in the done deal.   
      
      Either way, there is no Adam and Eve, no god, and no reason for a   
   'savior' pixie given the evidence of reality.   
      
   Warlord Steve   
   BAAWA   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)