Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.communism    |    Whats yours is mine...    |    8,857 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,077 of 8,857    |
|    Whip to All    |
|    re:Soviet Roots of Socialist European Un    |
|    05 Nov 06 22:50:05    |
      From: nowhere@none              Soviet Roots of Socialist European Union       Book Review by Richard Salbato       unitypub@unitypublishing.com              Back in 1985 I wrote a book called "The Ark of Apocalypse", and sub-titled       it "A fiction story of the future - I think". I believed that based on true       and approved prophecy and the trends in the world, I could figure out where       the world was headed and how. I saw it heading to total economic disaster,       starting in Europe, which was becoming more and more socialistic. I       envisioned (without hard evidence) the Communist Politburo in Moscow       financing and directing a gradual infiltration of Western European       governments making them more and more socialistic to the point of no return.       The more a government gives you the more it owns you. This was happening       all over Europe and seemed to have some kind of master plan.       To some people the USSR was a communist success but I knew better. It       seemed to be successful because it kept expanding. Let me explain it this       way. If you have a business that gets paid up front 50% before starting       work on each contract, you suddenly have money in your pocket. But if at       the end of that project you loose 20% you will go broke. If, however, half       way through that contract you sign another contract that will bring you the       same loss and get another 50% cash up front, you still seem to be successful       because you have 100% less 20% of other people's money. As long as you keep       expanding you do not see what a failure you are. In the 75 years of       Russia's expansion they did not see what a real failure they were. But in       1985 they began to see that the entire system was going to fail. This was       when Gorbachev took office and when I had already finished my book. Quickly       Communism in Russia seemed to fall apart and I began to think I was wrong       about my book and never published it. I kept trying to re-write it but       things kept changing so fast I just gave up.       I just read a small booklet by Vladimir Bukovsky called "EUSSR: The Soviet       Roots of European Integration" exposing secret documents of the Politburo in       Moscow and I now know that I was right in the first place. My original book       was more exact than the re-written versions. To explain this we must go       back into history a little bit.       The 1914 Communist Split       In 1914 Socialists split into Bolsheviks (communists) and Mensheviks       (socialists). The Marxist ideology was the same but they differed on       methods of achieving the goal. The communists took control by force and the       socialists used the democratic systems to gain power. For 70 years they       were antagonistic toward each other.              It was in the late 1970s and early 1980s that both sides had to re-consider       this hostile attitude towards each other and try to work together. In 1981       Communist Mitternad became President and began to introduce socialism in       France. In just a few years Mitternad's socialism almost destroyed the       economic system of France and like all socialist countries, it headed for       complete collapse.              Russia was on the brink of economic disaster because it was no longer       expanding, Ronald Reagan was pushing them to more and more military spending       that they could not afford and the entire system was about to collapse. Now       both the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks had to re-think their style of       communism.              "The soviet economic model, unproductive and wasteful by definition like all       socialist models, had brought them to the brink of bankruptcy. On the       other, their very 'success' in exporting that model to other countries was       becoming an unbearable burden to carry on their shoulders. With their       troops bogged down in Afghanistan, and with the Polish crisis looming large       on their doorstep, the 'cost of Empire' became virtually unsustainable.       Simply put, they had suddenly realized that their economic base was too       small for their global ambitions. Added to that a new round of the arms       race forced on them by Ronald Reagan, falling oil prices and a growing       discontent at home, and one could understand their sudden urge for reforms.       A final blow came with Reagan's obsession with the 'Star Wars' project.       Americans might have been bluffing, but the Soviets had to follow suit       regardless, trying to compete in the very sphere where they were most behind       the West - hi-tech. The only way to modernize the Soviet economy was to use       the 'class enemy's' technological potential." 1              Perestroika              On March 26, 1987 Gorbachev and the Politburo saw that they had to unite the       Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks and both sides had to compromise their methods       because both were loosing ground fast. Gorbachev believed that the       Mensheviks had to become more aggressive in government control and less       democracy and mapped out a plan to do just that. On the other hand the       Bolsheviks had to become more like the Bolsheviks and give up more control       to the masses and to the productive businesses. For this objective,       Gorbachev started having secret meetings with the socialists of Western       Europe and international Socialist Organizations like the Trilateral       Commission.              In these secret meeting (transcripts of which are in Vladimir Bukovsky's       booklet) Gorbachev and the Politburo came up with Perestroika for the       Soviets to become more like Western Socialists. But the failure of Western       Socialists was their lack of central control and their inability to       constantly grow, which is the failure of all Socialism. To find a solution       to both the Western weakness and the East's weakness the secret meetings       came up with a new policy called the ''Common European Home''. At that       Politburo meeting ''Common European Home'' was given the highest priority.       Having a plan for the Western Socialists and the Eastern Communists required       that both work to help each other. It meant to bring together all the West       and the East in a common EAST WEST GOVERNMENT, but little by little so that       the principle of constant expansion could apply and not let what happened to       Mitterrand's France happen to Europe as a whole.              The plan was to get rid of NATO and push America out of Europe and unit       Europe in the west, expand to the east and eventually to Russia. To       accomplish this they met with the Trilateral Commission on January 28, 1989.       Gorbachev - Rockefeller, Kissinger, Nacasone and Giscard d'Estaing worked       out how the Soviets could integrat into the world's economic and financial       institutions (e.g. GATT, IMF) and how to convert the Ruble into world              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca