XPost: soc.men, talk.environment, sci.environment   
   XPost: news.environment   
   From: BushIsATraitor@hotmail.com   
      
   > >> We can't?  You can't obviously.  But total solar output   
   > >> has been accurately monitored for over 100 years.   
      
   "krp"  wrote   
   >     Not PREDICTED accurately however!   
      
    When it comes to ascribing the origin of the observed surface warming of   
   the Earth, we use in part the History of the sun's output, not it's future   
   output you fucking idiot.   
      
     The History of the sun's output is well known, having been measured   
   directly for over the last 100 years.   
      
     Expert analysis - which you are clearly incapable of comprehending -   
   indicates that the Sun  have contributed as much as but no more than   
   about 20% of the observed warming.   
      
      
   > > Let me give you a hint you ignorant shitstain.  It   
   > > requires a stopwatch, a black box and a thermometer.   
   >   
   > > Ahahahahahahah... You fucking ignorant moron.   
      
      
   "krp"  wrote   
   >     Is that how YOU predict the output of the sun?   
      
     No, Shitstain, this is how we measure the current output of the sun.   
      
     We write that down in a book, and from there we can use the data to   
   determine how much the sun's minor variance has contributed to the currently   
   observed surface warming of the earth.  Conclusion no more than = less than   
   20%.   
      
      
      
   "krp"  wrote   
   > How does that device  "MEASURE" accurately the energy in a MASS EJECTION?   
      
     What makes you think you need to do so ShitStain?  Even a back of the   
   envelope calculation shows that they are many, many orders of magnitude   
   lower in average energy output than the normal background emissions from the   
   sun.   
      
     Wallow in your own ignorance krp.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)