XPost: soc.men, talk.environment, sci.environment
XPost: news.environment
From: web2457k@verizon.net
"VistaKing" wrote in message
news:ZSLuh.18188$Ah.4761@read2.cgocable.net...
>> Not PREDICTED accurately however!
> When it comes to ascribing the origin of the observed surface warming of
> the Earth, we use in part the History of the sun's output, not it's future
> output you fucking idiot.
Guy the BEST of the BEST in meterology cannot ACCURATELY predict
tonight's weather MUCH LESS global warming trends.
> The History of the sun's output is well known, having been measured
> directly for over the last 100 years.
NOPE. SOME of the sun's output has been measured. HOWEVER with flares,
sunspots and MASS EJECTIONS all those little tables go into a cocked hat!
Maybe you have missed that particularly in the past decade the sun has been
unusually active.
> Expert analysis - which you are clearly incapable of comprehending -
> indicates that the Sun have contributed as much as but no more than
> about 20% of the observed warming.
YOUR personal expert analysis? Because from what i read sceience is a
bit divided on the issue.
>> How does that device "MEASURE" accurately the energy in a MASS EJECTION?
> What makes you think you need to do so ShitStain? Even a back of the
> envelope calculation shows that they are many, many orders of magnitude
> lower in average energy output than the normal background emissions from
> the
> sun.
Maybe you missed the news that a recent mass ejection was well beyond
the ability of our instrumentation to measure by several factors of measure.
Glad you are so confident that the sun is this docile little creature.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
