Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.communism    |    Whats yours is mine...    |    8,857 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,540 of 8,857    |
|    Topaz to All    |
|    Re: Re: Hitlary: Is She Socialist or Com    |
|    29 Jun 07 16:50:48    |
      XPost: alt.politics, alt.freedom, alt.politics.socialism       XPost: alt.politics.republican       From: mars1933@hotmail.com               Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:       "German women, German men !       It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the       Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.       Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not       forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National       Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily       politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very       unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic       intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not       respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the       woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different       value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German       woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best       sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other       areas than the man.       The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but       also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in       the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices       and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best       suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless       devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.       The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the       past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea       of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread       winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the       man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is       not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her       talents and abilities.       Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the       frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men       were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to       the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men       always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all       great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination       have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually       loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the       woman.       It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must       be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our       attitude toward women.       The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in       government, politics, economics and social relations has not left       women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought       impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some       good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that       are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations       have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set       in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a       distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with       former ideals.       A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary       and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most       suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious       duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can       continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of       the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the       builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's       source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place       for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,       in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that       those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in       the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their       abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other       ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially       reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to       fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.       The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.       It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no       intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer       and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.       But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in       motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the       living mother of a family who gives the state children.       German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning       to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more       rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected       to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and       her daily bread is not a good trade.       A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in       our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now       the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most       evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's       birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without       emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The       government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the       resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental       change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is       responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying       about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each       elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by       1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are       the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it       will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine       the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.       We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our       national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The       national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation       on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the       woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends       to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of       our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our       blood is assured..."                     http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com              http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/              http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca