4b48abd7   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.anarchism, soc.rights.human   
      
   On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:58:56 -0700 (PDT), DarkMatter   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sep 17, 11:00 am, jimj122...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >   
   >> OK.  We'll let them cross the border and use their natural right to   
   >> unagressively move right into your house.   
   >   
   >You can't compare a state to a private house. The state is not your   
   >private house. It's simply too big to be compared to a house. And even   
   >if the state were a private house, a person doesn't have the moral   
   >right to claim or appropriate all land for himself and prohibit others   
   >from accessing and benefiting from that land too. Kings thought that   
   >way (that they could appropriate all land and diamonds for themselves)   
   >but since there are no kings anymore, the idea is no longer valid.   
   >   
   >For example as a person i don't have a right to claim an island solely   
   >for myself and shoot everyone who wants to come and benefit from it   
      
   There are small islands in this country that ARE owned by one person.   
   I used to live near a ranch of 100 square MILES that was privately   
   owned. It's both valid and moral. I'm sorry that your little marxist   
   mind can't grasp the concept of private property.   
      
   >too. It's simply not a moral thing to do. And that is why i think the   
   >current government (especially the Bush administration) is evil and   
   >should by abolished for the benefit of all humankind.   
      
   Nobody gives a damn for the rants of a lunatic.   
      
   >   
   >Many nations like Russia and Canada claim more land than they need and   
   >most of their land is neither useful nor habitable. Why do you claim   
   >land that you don't use?   
      
   For the children. Surely a leftist dolt like yourself has heard that   
   mantra?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)