d557dda9   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.anarchism, soc.rights.human   
      
   On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:06:13 -0700 (PDT), Michael Price   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sep 26, 11:54 pm, br...@pobox.com wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:49:11 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*"   
   >   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >On Sep 26, 8:26 am, Joseph K.  wrote:   
   >> >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:55:43 GMT, br...@pobox.com wrote:   
   >> >> >On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:05:27 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*"   
   >> >> > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>On Sep 24, 6:57 pm, dsharavi  wrote:   
   >> >> >>> On Sep 15, 9:28 am, DarkMatter  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> > To migrate and work to earn one's own living is a natural right.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> Bullshit.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>Some of us have been looking for a reasoned argument.   
   >> >> >>Perhaps you could redouble your efforts and supply us   
   >> >> >>with one.   
   >>   
   >> >> >Then start from a reasonable point, moronic, anti-american scum.   
   >>   
   >> >> Why are you so angry? We all love America here.   
   >>   
   >> >I don't think they have an argument, at least not one   
   >> >which they want to expose in public, and yet they   
   >> >obviously have strong feelings about the subject,   
   >> >which must be very frustrating.   
   >>   
   >> Thus far, you dimwitted left wingers have demonstrated no ability to   
   >> think. Please do not make claims that you can't fulfill.   
   >>   
   >  Another insult without any argument.  If you want to respond   
   >to a claim that you have no argument it makes no look stupid   
   >not to make one.   
   >>   
   >> >I gather from epithets like "anti-American" that we're   
   >> >dealing with the expected feelings of any trooping   
   >> >primate when invasion is threatened or perceived.   
   >> >Immigration, especially illegal or uncontrolled   
   >> >immigration, is seen as a threat to the established   
   >> >collectivity of the tribe.   
   >>   
   >> Come back when you learn to think for yourself, brainwashed little   
   >> girl.   
   >>   
   >  Why will you give her something to think about?  Because so far   
   >you've simply made claims you can't support and then accused others   
   >of doing so.   
   >>   
   >> >But these feelings run counter to the theory of the   
   >> >liberal state (in this case), which they also feel,   
   >> >apparently, they must acknowledge, hence the talk   
   >> >about "sovereign individuals" and the "rule of law"   
   >> >which actually have little or nothing to do with the   
   >> >desire to keep out the aliens.   
   >>   
   >> Please don't presume to judge the mountain of other's   
   >> experiences from the summit of your personal mole-hill,   
   >> ignorant child.   
   >>   
   >  She wasn't.  She was merely observing that your territorial   
   >feelings run counter to the theory of the liberal state, that is   
   >a state that is not completely authoritarian.  This assessment   
   >is entirely accurate.   
   >>   
   >> >So there's a contradiction between ostensible   
   >> >principles and actual feelings.   
   >>   
   >> It's always fun to watch one of the casualties of our current   
   >> "education" system babble.   
   >   
   >  Well, no you haven't been fun at all.  You simply insult and make   
   >claims that other people are stupid because they don't believe your   
   >arguments, but you don't make any.   
      
   Why should I pretend that you dimwitted trash are intelligent? It's a   
   lie and serves no usefull purpose.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)