ba754093   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.anarchism, soc.rights.human   
      
   On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:09:04 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*"   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sep 26, 10:16 am, Joseph K.  wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:49:11 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >On Sep 26, 8:26 am, Joseph K.  wrote:   
   >> >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:55:43 GMT, br...@pobox.com wrote:   
   >> >> >On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:05:27 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*"   
   >> >> > wrote:   
   >> >> >>On Sep 24, 6:57 pm, dsharavi  wrote:   
   >> >> >>> On Sep 15, 9:28 am, DarkMatter  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> > To migrate and work to earn one's own living is a natural right.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> Bullshit.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>Some of us have been looking for a reasoned argument.   
   >> >> >>Perhaps you could redouble your efforts and supply us   
   >> >> >>with one.   
   >>   
   >> >> >Then start from a reasonable point, moronic, anti-american scum.   
   >>   
   >> >> Why are you so angry? We all love America here.   
   >>   
   >> >I don't think they have an argument, at least not one   
   >> >which they want to expose in public, and yet they   
   >> >obviously have strong feelings about the subject,   
   >> >which must be very frustrating.   
   >>   
   >> >I gather from epithets like "anti-American" that we're   
   >> >dealing with the expected feelings of any trooping   
   >> >primate when invasion is threatened or perceived.   
   >> >Immigration, especially illegal or uncontrolled   
   >> >immigration, is seen as a threat to the established   
   >> >collectivity of the tribe.   
   >>   
   >> >But these feelings run counter to the theory of the   
   >> >liberal state (in this case), which they also feel,   
   >> >apparently, they must acknowledge, hence the talk   
   >> >about "sovereign individuals" and the "rule of law"   
   >> >which actually have little or nothing to do with the   
   >> >desire to keep out the aliens.   
   >>   
   >> >So there's a contradiction between ostensible   
   >> >principles and actual feelings.   
   >>   
   >> I was thinking something different, that those who strongly oppose   
   >> immigration are the weakest  elements of the collectivity only, those   
   >> who can lose a job because of immigrants or those who expose their   
   >> youngsters to seduction by wetback types because they live in areas   
   >> where Mexicans are relatively abundant. The strong ones, instead of   
   >> complaining about immigration, they actually use immigrants, to carry   
   >> out certain jobs cheaply. I guess Mexicans invade America for a   
   >> reason, they aren't that stupid, it must be because they are needed,   
   >> whereas in their own nations, they are superfluous.   
   >   
   >Well, it is the weakest or most vulnerable   
   >members of a collectivity who are most likely to   
   >cite, call upon and rely on the collective.  In New   
   >York City, it's welcome to all as long as we can   
   >exploit you.  Bring plenty of euros or a strong   
   >back.   
   >   
   >The frustation comes about because right-wing   
   >ideologues, by and large, don't supply these   
   >people with a proper _Blut_und_Boden_ rap.   
   >I guess they're being exploited too.  I know anti-   
   >immigrant feelings, as well as outright racism,   
   >are useful in breaking up unions.   
      
   Evidently the dimwit was on drugs throughout school and as a result,   
   never learned the definition of the word "illegal". They're not   
   immigrants, halfwit. They're FOREIGN CRIMINAL TRASH.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)