XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.impeach.bush, alt.non.racism   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.2600   
   From: turdfred2@catholic.org   
      
   Ken Marino wrote:   
   > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:08:19 -0700, Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:   
   >   
   >> Ken Marino wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:15:38 +0000, Way Back Jack wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:02:09 -0700 (PDT), Writerosity   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> It doesn't matter. =A0The Republican party knows, as I suspect you   
   >>>>>>> do, that influence alone can get a voter to vote your way. =A0If   
   >>>>>>> that influence   
   >>>>>>> is base on deception or threats, and it undermines our democracy,   
   >>>>>>> the strength   
   >>>>>>> of the nation, the welfare of our citizens and our freedom, then it   
   >>>>>>> is wrong, and in this case, it's illegal.   
   >>>>>> Oh, you must be referring to the mainstream left-wing media.   
   >>>>> There is deception in the media from all sides, but by and large, the   
   >>>>> right wing media, which IS the manstream media, lies the most, and   
   >>>>> whines the loudest when they are called to answer for those lies,   
   >>>>> only they call it "bias."  As the great pundit Stephen Colbert told   
   >>>>> Bush, to his FACE, "the truth has a well-known liberal bias."  In   
   >>>>> this world, there   
   >>>>> are those who are corrupt, and those who are not, and the Republicans   
   >>>>> are corrupt as HELL.  ANOTHER false comparison.  You're batting a   
   >>>>> THOUSAND.   
   >>>> HUH?  Charlie Gibson, Katie Couric, Brian Williams, the NYTimes and   
   >>>> most of the other major dailies, Time, Newsweek, CNN, NPR, PBS ....   
   >>>> are RIGHT WING!!!!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You don't know your right from your left, punk.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>> 2nd Clue: Labor unions are pressuring their people to vote for   
   >>>>>>>> Nobama.=   
   >>>>> - H=3D   
   >>>>>>> ide quoted text -   
   >>>>>>> Unions are there to protect the workers. =A0It's a false   
   >>>>>>> comparison. =A0=   
   >>>>> Do   
   >>>>>>> you have ONE   
   >>>>>>> valid point?   
   >>>>>> Companies are there to protect their stockholders.   
   >>>>> FINALLY, a little truth.  Yes, companies are there to protect the   
   >>>>> stockholders, provided THEY OBEY THE LAW.  Money does not trump   
   >>>>> Democracy, as long as we as a nation make sure it's working the way   
   >>>>> it was designed to.  I understand why you are so reluctant to tell   
   >>>>> the truth.  Admitting that the companies are more loyal to money than   
   >>>>> to the people of this country is damning evidence of conservative   
   >>>>> corruption ingrained in the culture.  It shows you who the real   
   >>>>> traitors are and who the REAL Americans are. But don't stop telling   
   >>>>> the truth just because you're snitching on your people.  The truth   
   >>>>> will set you free!   
   >>>> Companies also provide the goods, services, and JOBS.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> But hey, let's tax the hell out of them, even more than currently,   
   >>>>>> so that they can raise prices and lay off workers.   
   >>>>> You can't threaten us with that bogeyman anymore.  Under Bush's   
   >>>>> watch, we've lost more jobs and faced higher prices than at any time   
   >>>>> in history, and   
   >>>>> the Corporations got all the tax breaks they wanted.  Corporations   
   >>>>> raise prices because they LOVE MONEY, and they lay off workers FOR   
   >>>>> THE SAME REASON, whether it's Bush in office for eight years or a   
   >>>>> Democrat.  You SUCK.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Writerosity   
   >>>> Well, tell ya what, let's tax 'em out of existence like ya boy Barry   
   >>>> wants to do.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You grow the cabbge; I'll grow the tomatoes; well place the produce in   
   >>>> a central location and share with all, comrade.   
   >>> Isn't it amazing. The liberal leaning unions suggest their members vote   
   >>> for such and such candidate. Wal=mart suggests it's employees vote for   
   >>> a certain candidate. Mind you voting is secret and private for both   
   >>> groups so neither Wal-mart nor the unions know who you really vote for.   
   >>> But Wal- mart is using unfair intimidation and what the unions do is   
   >>> perfectly acceptable. And don't forget, it is these same unions that   
   >>> want to eliminate secret ballots.   
   >> Do you have a citation for that? (other than Limbaugh and O'Reilly who   
   >> simply make stuff up)   
   >   
   > Yes, I do     http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/bg2175.cfm   
   >   
   > and there are many more links if you just google unions and secret ballots   
      
   This has nothing to do with federal elections, you are one retarded   
   fuckhead. This is what is wrong with stupid people like you, you   
   continually confuse issues. Can't you tell the difference between a   
   federal election and a union election? Let me spell it out for you   
   moron: a federal election elects a president for the country, a union   
   election elects the union president, the treasurer etc. Only a really   
   stupid person would confuse the two. But you have managed to do so.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)