XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.impeach.bush, alt.non.racism
XPost: alt.politics, alt.2600
From: here@home
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:22:42 -0700, Rev Turd Fredericks
wrote:
>Way Back Jack wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:24:07 -0700, Rev Turd Fredericks
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Way Back Jack wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:38:38 -0700, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Way Back Jack wrote:
>>>>>> TRANSLATION: You cannot identify any *labor* unions whose leaders
>>>>>> don't "give a fuck" for whom their sheepies vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So why make such an assertion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> My Union has never approached me, in email, in person or otherwise, and
>>>>> asked me to vote a certain way. It is true, if you go to their website,
>>>>> that they support Obama, and justifiably so, but I have never been asked
>>>>> to vote for him by any union representative.
>>>> The other asshole said that many Unions don't give a fuck; I'm saying
>>>> that the overwhelming majority of them want the sheep to vote for the
>>>> more liberal candidate, as yours did, regardless of whether they
>>>> twisted your arm.
>>>>
>>>> Similarly, the Wal Mart people didn't twist arms. Some other poster
>>>> here said that the entire WalMart story is fabricated.
>>> You forget that unions can't hire or fire you.
>>
>> Unions can boot you out.
>
>Not mine, unless I don't pay my dues
I've known unions who booted people out for working thru their
designated breaks.
>>> If your sole support for
>>> your family is Wal-mart and they are telling you to vote a certain way,
>>> there is a conflict of interest.
>>
>> Does the WalMart CEO accompany you in the voting booth?
>
>Neither does the union. And they have no recourse if I actually tell
>them who I voted for.
Then why all the fuss about WalMart?
Doh.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
