XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion, aus.religion   
   XPost: aus.politics, uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: fasgnadh@yahoo.com.au   
      
   AZ Nomad wrote:   
   > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:48:04 -0700 (PDT), Richo    
   wrote:   
   >> On Mar 29, 5:14 pm, AZ Nomad  wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT), Richo    
   wrote:   
   >>>> [snip off topic newsgroups]   
   >>>> On Mar 6, 8:16 am, Virgil  wrote:   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>  fasgnadh  wrote:   
    >>>>>> Virgil continued the atheist membership drive, recruiting babies;   
    >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If the person making that claim is including non-beleivers in gods, as   
   >>>>>>> well as anti-believers, in his/her definition of A-theism (without a   
   >>>>>>> god), then babies are certainly non-believers.   
    >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> As are rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog, Deefa!   
   >>>>>> In fact Deefa is the most intelligent of all of you.. and unlike   
   >>>>>> Atheists, HE'S NOT BARKING MAD!    B^D   
    >>>>   
   >>>> Atheists are people (or conscious sentient beings) capable of   
   >>>> believing - who do not believe.   
   >>>> It is stupid to refer to dogs, babies and rocks as being atheist.   
      
   Clearly you are outnumbered, the atheist majority are desperate   
   to boost the numbers of your pathetic, tiny cult;   
      
   >>> If they don't have a god belief then they are atheist.   
      
   rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog, Deefa   
   don't have a god belief, according to these atheist CRETINS,   
   that makes them Atheists!   
      
   BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA!   
      
   At least those sub-epsilon atheist morons recognise their   
   INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORS!   
      
   BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAAHAHAAHHAHA!   
      
   EVERYTHING, that has an IQ small enough not to be able to   
   form a belief!!!!   
      
   BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAA   
      
   Watching atheists debate is like watching 'tards   
   compare their lobotomy scars to see which one had   
   the most brain removed;   
      
   >> They are neither atheist or theist.   
   >> The concept is inapplicable.   
   > So you asert.  How is it inapplicable?   
   >   
      
      
   Dog shit and Used Tampons,   
   Smegma and Snot all lack 'a God belief'   
      
   > Are they god believers?  No?   
      
   No.   
      
    > Then they are atheist.   
   >   
      
   BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA   
      
   Atheism's FINEST!!!!!   
      
      
   BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA   
      
   I leave this here because it shows how, even when   
   debating each other, atheists quickly degenerate   
   into witless ad hom and abuse;   
      
   >>>> We don't refer to rocks as "non smokers" - because we assume that non   
   >>>> smokers are beings capable of smoking tobacco who do not smoke   
   >>>> tobacco.   
   >>> If they don't smoke, they are non-smokers.   
   >>>   
   >   
   >> They are neither smokers or non smokers.   
   >> The concept is inapplicable.   
   > You already said that.  Repeating it doesn't help your argument.   
   >   
   > ...   
   >   
   > Either say something new, or please kindly shut the fuck up.   
      
      
   --   
      
      
         Subject: AQOTM fraud is a clear Breach of AQOTM RULES!!!!   8^o   
                  Quotemeister *nemo*toad implicated!  8^o   
         Message-ID: <49847258$0$3253$afc38...@news.optusnet.com.au>   
      
         http://tinyurl.com/b4hemx   
      
         BwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!   
      
      
   http://theatreinbrussels.com/ecc/images/stories/Productions/animalfarm-web.png   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)