home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.communism      Whats yours is mine...      8,857 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,254 of 8,857   
   fasgnadh to All   
   Re: The Real atheists: Dog Shit, Used Ta   
   03 Apr 09 11:00:29   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion, aus.religion   
   XPost: aus.politics, uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: fasgnadh@yahoo.com.au   
      
   They call me Trinity faces ultimate humiliation, unable to defend his   
   shitdribble and lies:   
    > fasgnadh wrote:   
    >> They call me Trinity wrote:   
    >>> fasgnadh wrote:   
    >>>> AZ Nomad wrote:   
    >>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:48:04 -0700 (PDT), Richo   
    >>>>>  wrote:   
    >>>>>> On Mar 29, 5:14 pm, AZ Nomad  wrote:   
    >>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT), Richo   
    >>>>>>>  wrote:   
    >>>>>>>> [snip off topic newsgroups]   
    >>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 8:16 am, Virgil  wrote:   
    >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
    >>>>>>>>>  fasgnadh  wrote:   
    >>>>>>>>>> Virgil continued the atheist membership drive,   
    >>>>>>>>>> recruiting babies;   
    >>>>>>>>>>>   
    >>>>>>>>>>> If the person making that claim is including   
    >>>>>>>>>>> non-beleivers in   
    >>>>>>>>>>> gods, as well as anti-believers, in his/her definition   
    >>>>>>>>>>> of A-theism (without a god),   
    >>>>>>>>>>> then babies are certainly non-believers.   
    >>>>>>>>>>   
    >>>>>>>>>> As are rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog,   
    >>>>>>>>>> Deefa!   
    >>>>>>>>>> In fact Deefa is the most intelligent of all of   
    >>>>>>>>>> you.. and unlike Atheists, HE'S NOT BARKING MAD!    B^D   
    >>>>>>>>   
    >>>>>>>> Atheists are people (or conscious sentient beings) capable of   
    >>>>>>>> believing - who do not believe.   
    >>>>>>>> It is stupid to refer to dogs, babies and rocks as being   
    >>>>>>>> atheist.   
    >>>>   
    >>>> Clearly you are outnumbered, the atheist majority are desperate   
    >>>> to boost the numbers of your pathetic, tiny cult;   
    >>>>   
    >>>>>>> If they don't have a god belief then they are atheist.   
    >>>>   
    >>>> rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog, Deefa   
    >>>> don't have a god belief, according to these atheist CRETINS,   
    >>>> that makes them Atheists!   
    >>>>   
    >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA!   
    >>>>   
    >>>> At least those sub-epsilon atheist morons recognise their   
    >>>> INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORS!   
    >>>>   
    >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAAHAHAAHHAHA!   
    >>>>   
    >>>> EVERYTHING, that has an IQ small enough not to be able to   
    >>>> form a belief!!!!   
    >>>>   
    >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAA   
    >>>>   
    >>>> Watching atheists debate is like watching 'tards   
    >>>> compare their lobotomy scars to see which one had   
    >>>> the most brain removed;   
    >>>>   
    >>>>>> They are neither atheist or theist.   
    >>>>>> The concept is inapplicable.   
    >>>>> So you asert.  How is it inapplicable?   
    >>>>   
    >>>>   
    >>>> Dog shit and Used Tampons,   
    >>>> Smegma and Snot all lack 'a God belief'   
    >>>>   
    >>>>> Are they god believers?  No?   
    >>>>   
    >>>> No.   
    >>>>   
    >>>>> Then they are atheist.   
    >>>>>   
    >>>>   
    >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA   
    >>>>   
    >>>> Atheism's FINEST!!!!!   
    >>>>   
    >>>>   
    >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA   
    >>>   
    >>>   
    >>> Are you a true believer Fas?   
    >>   
    >> Yes, I believe in reason, the Scientific method, Truth, Einstein's   
    >> religious viewpoint, meaningful human existence and God.   
    >>   
    >> But I also believe in exposing liars and frauds, mocking irrational   
    >> and dangerous ideologies and puncturing hubris.. all of which   
    >> makes the numerous atheist cretins in Usenet deserving targets   
    >> for satire and ridicule.   
    >>   
    >> So far you haven't said anything worth the trouble,   
      
   And when challenged to explain your lies, you have folded faster   
   than the deckchairs on the Titanic...    B^D   
      
    >> but the other   
    >> lunatic atheists who argue that you have to count Dog Shit and Used   
    >> Tampons among your number, to boost your pitiful membership roll,   
    >> are certainly the subject of derisive laughter!   B^D   
    >>   
    >> And you appear to be the flanking attack, use by the intellectually   
    >> inept when they CANT RATIONALLY REFUTE my argument, HAVE NO FACTS   
    >> TO SUPPORT their own hilarious stupidity, and are thus incapable of   
    >> ANY RATIONAL RESPONSE to my evisceration of their cretinous crap!   
    >>   
    >> When I have clearly won the logical debate, and you intellectually   
    >> dishonest atheists have NOTHING but ad hom and abuse to offer, then   
    >> I talk to you in the manner you have chosen..  and tap dance on your   
    >> carcase and to further expose your RANK HYPOCRISY;   
    >>   
    >>>> I leave this here because it shows how, even when   
    >>>> debating each other, atheists quickly degenerate   
    >>>> into witless ad hom and abuse;   
    >>>>   
    >>>>>>>> We don't refer to rocks as "non smokers" - because   
    >>>>>>>> we assume that non   
    >>>>>>>> smokers are beings capable of smoking tobacco who do not smoke   
    >>>>>>>> tobacco.   
    >>>>>>> If they don't smoke, they are non-smokers.   
    >>>>>>>   
    >>>>>   
    >>>>>> They are neither smokers or non smokers.   
    >>>>>> The concept is inapplicable.   
    >>>>> You already said that.  Repeating it doesn't help your argument.   
    >>>>>   
    >>>>> ...   
    >>>>>   
    >>>>> Either say something new, or please kindly shut the fuck up.   
    >>   
    >> That is how atheists communicate, abusive with each other, clearly,   
    >> as they do with others, as has been well documented;   
    >>   
    >> # From: "John Fraser"    
    >> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism   
    >> # Subject: Merry Christmas   
    >> # Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:21:03 -0400   
    >> # Message-ID: <4953abb6$1$5460$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>   
    >> #   
    >> # Hello Folks;   
    >> #   
    >> #     I'd like to wish all of you a very Merry Christmas   
    >> #     and a safe holiday season.  Phil 4:8.   
    >> #   
    >> # Cheers,   
    >> # John   
    >>   
    >>   
    >>   
    >> # From: Christopher A. Lee    
    >> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism   
    >> # Subject: Re: Merry Christmas   
    >> # Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:24:01 -0500   
    >> # Message-ID:    
    >> #   
    >> # "go fuck yourself with your crucifix in a drill chuck'.   
    >>   
    >> I don't recall you whining about that filthy ATHEIST shitpig's   
    >> VILE PSYCHO-SEXUAL ABUSE, you weak hypocrite!!!   B^p   
    >>   
    >> Clearly, atheists resort to abusive ad hom because they have no   
    >> logical argument, and as history shows,  with the brutal   
    >> barbarism of the Union of Savage Slaughter and Repression (USSR)   
    >> and Mao's Cultural Devolution  and Great Leap   
    >> BACKWARDS (over 40,000,000 dead victims of atheist   
    >> depravity) they are vicious moral defectives.   
    >>   
    >> I, on the other hand, HAVE a logical argument, which you   
    >> could not rebut in the slightest, could not   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca