XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion, aus.religion
XPost: aus.politics, uk.politics.misc
From: fasgnadh@yahoo.com.au
They call me Trinity faces ultimate humiliation, unable to defend his
shitdribble and lies:
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> They call me Trinity wrote:
>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> AZ Nomad wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:48:04 -0700 (PDT), Richo
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 29, 5:14 pm, AZ Nomad wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT), Richo
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> [snip off topic newsgroups]
>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 8:16 am, Virgil wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> Virgil continued the atheist membership drive, recruiting
>>>> babies;
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If the person making that claim is including non-beleivers in
>>>>>>>>>>> gods, as well as anti-believers, in his/her definition
>>>>>>>>>>> of A-theism (without a god),
>>>>>>>>>>> then babies are certainly non-believers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As are rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog,
>>>>>>>>>> Deefa!
>>>>>>>>>> In fact Deefa is the most intelligent of all of you.. and unlike
>>>>>>>>>> Atheists, HE'S NOT BARKING MAD! B^D
>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> Atheists are people (or conscious sentient beings) capable of
>>>>>>>> believing - who do not believe.
>>>>>>>> It is stupid to refer to dogs, babies and rocks as being atheist.
>>>>
>>>> Clearly you are outnumbered, the atheist majority are desperate
>>>> to boost the numbers of your pathetic, tiny cult;
>>>>
>>>>>>> If they don't have a god belief then they are atheist.
>>>>
>>>> rocks, trees, grains of sand on the beach and my dog, Deefa
>>>> don't have a god belief, according to these atheist CRETINS,
>>>> that makes them Atheists!
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA!
>>>>
>>>> At least those sub-epsilon atheist morons recognise their
>>>> INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORS!
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAAHAHAAHHAHA!
>>>>
>>>> EVERYTHING, that has an IQ small enough not to be able to
>>>> form a belief!!!!
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAA
>>>>
>>>> Watching atheists debate is like watching 'tards
>>>> compare their lobotomy scars to see which one had
>>>> the most brain removed;
>>>>
>>>>>> They are neither atheist or theist.
>>>>>> The concept is inapplicable.
>>>>> So you asert. How is it inapplicable?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dog shit and Used Tampons,
>>>> Smegma and Snot all lack 'a God belief'
>>>>
>>>>> Are they god believers? No?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>>> Then they are atheist.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>>>
>>>> Atheism's FINEST!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you a true believer Fas?
>>
>> Yes, I believe in reason, the Scientific method, Truth, Einstein's
>> religious viewpoint, meaningful human existence and God.
>>
>> But I also believe in exposing liars and frauds, mocking irrational
>> and dangerous ideologies and puncturing hubris.. all of which makes the
>> numerous atheist cretins in Usenet deserving targets for satire and
>> ridicule.
>>
>> So far you haven't said anything worth the trouble,
And when challenged to explain your lies, you have folded faster
than the deckchairs on the Titanic...
>> but the other
>> lunatic atheists who argue that you have to count Dog Shit and Used
>> Tampons among your number, to boost your pitiful membership roll,
>> are certainly the subject of derisive laughter! B^D
>>
>> And you appear to be the flanking attack, use by the intellectually
>> inept when they CANT RATIONALLY REFUTE my argument, HAVE NO FACTS
>> TO SUPPORT their own hilarious stupidity, and are thus incapable of
>> ANY RATIONAL RESPONSE to my evisceration of their cretinous crap!
>>
>> When I have clearly won the logical debate, and you intellectually
>> dishonest atheists have NOTHING but ad hom and abuse to offer, then
>> I talk to you in the manner you have chosen.. and tap dance on your
>> carcase and to further expose your RANK HYPOCRISY;
>>
>>>> I leave this here because it shows how, even when
>>>> debating each other, atheists quickly degenerate
>>>> into witless ad hom and abuse;
>>>>
>>>>>>>> We don't refer to rocks as "non smokers" - because we assume that
>>>>>>>> non
>>>>>>>> smokers are beings capable of smoking tobacco who do not smoke
>>>>>>>> tobacco.
>>>>>>> If they don't smoke, they are non-smokers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> They are neither smokers or non smokers.
>>>>>> The concept is inapplicable.
>>>>> You already said that. Repeating it doesn't help your argument.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Either say something new, or please kindly shut the fuck up.
>>
>> That is how atheists communicate, abusive with each other, clearly,
>> as they do with others, as has been well documented;
>>
>> # From: "John Fraser"
>> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
>> # Subject: Merry Christmas
>> # Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:21:03 -0400
>> # Message-ID: <4953abb6$1$5460$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>
>> #
>> # Hello Folks;
>> #
>> # I'd like to wish all of you a very Merry Christmas
>> # and a safe holiday season. Phil 4:8.
>> #
>> # Cheers,
>> # John
>>
>>
>>
>> # From: Christopher A. Lee
>> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
>> # Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
>> # Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:24:01 -0500
>> # Message-ID:
>> #
>> # "go fuck yourself with your crucifix in a drill chuck'.
>>
>> I don't recall you whining about that filthy ATHEIST shitpig's
>> VILE PSYCHO-SEXUAL ABUSE, you weak hypocrite!!! B^p
>>
>> Clearly, atheists resort to abusive ad hom because they have no logical
>> argument, and as history shows, with the brutal barbarism of the Union
>> of Savage Slaughter and Repression (USSR) and Mao's Cultural Devolution
>> and Great Leap BACKWARDS (over 40,000,000 dead victims of atheist
>> depravity) they are vicious moral defectives.
>>
>> I, on the other hand, HAVE a logical argument, which you could not rebut
>> in the slightest, could not refute a SINGLE point, instead you SNIPPED
>> it all, and chose to hypocritically WHINE, without any supporting
>> evidence, about 'swearing' and 'insult' B^D
>>
>> As I have shown, I have provided argument AND truthful insult to those
>> who deserve it, while you pathetic hypocrites who WHINE about bourgeois
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
