home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.communism      Whats yours is mine...      8,857 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,353 of 8,857   
   aracari to GOOGLER 'Morton'   
   Re: hitler was a socialist.............   
   14 Aug 09 22:33:18   
   
   972fcb2f   
   XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.radical-left   
   From: spamtrap@váilable.here.com   
      
     GOOGLER 'Morton' wrote thus:   
      
      
   >On Aug 11, 5:18 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:   
   >> "FACE"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:jh7385h10q5sr608sf4kvqdk23ca11o939@4ax.com...   
   >>   
   >> > This is a long piece that gives consideration to both sides of the   
   >> > question.  It appears to be well documented, and is definitely weighted to   
   >> > Hitler being a socialist.   
   >>   
   >> If you read Mein Kampf, you're left in no doubt.   
      
      
   >That means that Obama's a Nazi who is going to build death camps for   
   >the Jews, Socialists, Communists and the Roma, all while outlawing   
   >trade unions.   
   >   
   >Mein Kamph was written in the years well before the Nazi Party rose to   
   >become a fascist shawdow of what was described in Mein Kamph.  You're   
   >use of Mein Kamph as the one and only source of proof, proves that you   
   >are disingenious.  Like most of you liars, you probably haven't read   
   >it.   Most of you haven't taken a history class since you dropped out   
   >of school at 16.   
   >   
   >One of the most frequent arguments used in favor of the notion that   
   >Hitler and   
   >the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) were   
   >leftist is the   
   >fact that they used "sozialistische" in the party's title. The   
   >party's   
   >appropriation of the term was a sick lie.   
      
   All of a sudden I can see you have cut/pasted this. You should   
   pay more attention to pasting to get line length sorted out :-)   
      
      
   >Generally there have been three broad economic variations in terms of   
   >ownership of production: aristocracy, in which a ruling elite owns the   
   >land   
   >and productive wealth; capitalism, in which a broader range of   
   >private   
   >individuals own the means of production; and socialism, in which   
   >everyone owns   
   >and controls the means of production.   
      
   Wrong wrong wrong. It's never *everyone* who owns the means   
   of production in your 3rd scenario. That's just claptrap which   
   fools are told. It's actually the State, and that is under the   
   control of a handful of despots. That makes a big difference.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca