Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.communism    |    Whats yours is mine...    |    8,857 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,533 of 8,857    |
|    Dale to All    |
|    production model    |
|    18 Nov 14 00:19:59    |
      XPost: sci.econ, alt.society.labor-unions, alt.freemasonry       From: dale@dalekelly.org              Apply supply and demand to labor. Pay the jobs less people want, more. Pay the       jobs more people want, less. That would be communal capitalism. Call it       socialism, but not fascism. I would only apply this to public endeavors, and I       think publicly traded        enterprise is public endeavor for reasons too long for a blurb. Private       endeavor should be bound by only one anti-trust regulation, operation by       economies of scale, in other words when demand goes up price goes down etc.       Ofcourse there are livelyhoods        depending on the status quo establishment that would have to be balanced by an       implementation of such a paradigm. Perhaps start-ups would see it in their       interest and lead the way, even if private. Seems to me it would be a       tremendous boon to production.        Both communists and capitalists seem to like production as far as my studies       have went. Certainly skill preparation/assessment would be variables, and       perhaps standardized, in any implementation. But a flavor related to this       would get macroeconomics out        of the way of microeconomics. I think it applies to nationalists, too.              --       (my whereabouts below)       http://www.dalekelly.org              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca