Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.communism    |    Whats yours is mine...    |    8,857 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,541 of 8,857    |
|    Robert Rabin to All    |
|    Memorial to honour victims of communism     |
|    26 Sep 15 22:06:09    |
      XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: alt.politics       From: rrabin@newmexico.com              OTTAWA — A federal advisory panel lambasted an early, sombre       design for a national memorial to the victims of communism as       potentially “detrimental to the dignity” of nearby Parliament       Hill, newly released documents show.              The National Capital Commission’s advisory committee on       planning, design and realty also had concerns last year about       the project’s price tag, “negative symbolism” and structural       safety, particularly in the slippery Ottawa winters, the       internal records reveal.              Other documents disclosed under the Access to Information Act       say the projected cost of the memorial — to be covered by       federal and private funds — had almost doubled to about $6       million by January of this year.              The records help explain why the commission unveiled plans in       May for a redesigned and significantly smaller version of the       memorial. The commission is expected to consider a final design       in November, after the federal election.              The Conservative government has strongly backed the planned       memorial as a means of recognizing the more than 100 million       people around the globe who died or suffered under communist       regimes. The government is managing the project on behalf of       Tribute to Liberty, a charity established in 2008.              The initiative has drawn fierce criticism from critics who       object to the memorial’s stark design and location on a patch of       green in the parliamentary precinct long reserved for a new       Federal Court building.              A lawsuit aimed at blocking the project has been placed on hold       until after the final design has been approved.              It was well-known that the federal advisory committee, composed       of leading architects and planners from across Canada, had       concerns about the memorial. But the newly released minutes of       the committee’s Aug. 21 and 22, 2014, meetings reveal disdain       for the entry that would later be selected as the winner by a       jury.              The design by Toronto-based Abstrakt Studio Architecture       features a series of angular peaks, or “memory folds,” with more       than 100 million pixel-like “memory squares” — each representing       a person — covering the exterior face of the folds. The initial       idea was to have the folds depict a mural of dead bodies when       viewed from a distance. The design also includes a Bridge of       Hope and elevated viewing platform.              The members praised the plan to depict individuals as “a strong       gesture” and said the overall concept “makes a statement.” But       they also considered the design:              — Well over budget;       — Replete with negative symbolism that could be misinterpreted       as offering no hope, and be detrimental to the dignity of       Parliament Hill;       — A statement of negativity, since the images of corpses would       be seen from many vantage points in the capital;       — Problematic to build in that subtleties would be lost in the       execution;       — To pose safety and accessibility issues, including slippery       surfaces in winter;       — Too similar to a planned national Holocaust monument.              The committee also worried the Bridge of Hope would offer a less-       than-inspiring view of a heating plant and felt a planned       “aggressive lighting scheme” would alter the Parliament Hill       landscape.              The National Capital Commission cited ongoing input from the       advisory committee in late June when it outlined several changes       to the winning design.              The memorial would now occupy just over one-third of the site —       not 60 per cent — and its overall height had dropped by about       half to approximately five metres.              The new plan also included more attention to landscaping,       additional trees, nuanced lighting and better access for the       disabled. In addition, it emphasized the theme of Canada “as a       land of refuge” in the memorial’s imagery and message.              http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/planned-memorial-to-       honour-victims-of-communism-was-initial-slammed-as-detrimental-       to-dignity-of-parliament-hill              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca