Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.communism    |    Whats yours is mine...    |    8,857 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,687 of 8,857    |
|    Sara Jacobs Is A Communist Prostitu to All    |
|    Dems wage battle against Arizona's 'ball    |
|    17 May 18 05:54:08    |
      XPost: oc.wanted, alt.politics.usa.republicans, rec.arts.tv       XPost: ca.news       From: communist-scum@womenvoteproject.org              PHOENIX – Democrats are continuing their legal battle against       Arizona’s “ballot harvesting” law, claiming it was passed to       dilute minority voting power.              This comes even as a federal judge recently ruled the law was       constitutional.              The law, which makes it illegal for absentee voters to allow       others to collect their completed absentee ballots and submit       them to election officials on the voters' behalf, was enacted in       2016. Under the law, if a person gets caught taking other       people’s completed ballots to the polls for them, he or she       could face felony charges.              The Arizona Democratic Party and Democratic National Committee       sued the state and Maricopa County over the law. But it was       upheld May 8 after U.S. District Judge Douglas Rayes ruled the       groups failed to show that the Arizona legislature passed the       law with the intent of suppressing minority voters.              Democrats have vowed to continue their legal fight.              “I respect the court’s decision but I don’t agree with it and       that’s why,” said State Rep. Richard Andrade, D-Glendale about       why the ruling was still being challenged. “It’s something that       really impacts certain people.”              Andrade said the law disenfranchises those who live in remote       areas, working-class families, minorities and those with       disabilities because they have a tough time getting to a post       office.              “You have your family to take care of and make sure you put food       on the table and everything, they’re not going to miss a day out       of work—or they might not be able to get away from their job to       even stop by the county elections to drop off that ballot       because they just don’t have that luxury,” Andrade said. “We are       taking that luxury away from people and punishing them by       saying, ‘Hey, your vote doesn’t matter.’”              Republicans argue the law is necessary to prevent voter fraud.       State Rep. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale, who sponsored the       bill, said she was pleased the court upheld the law. She said       ballot harvesting is ripe for abuse – and could disenfranchise       legitimate voters.              “Think about it. It’s election season and you’ve taken upon       yourself to perhaps knock on someone’s door or multiple doors       and collect their ballot with, I’m assuming, the intent to turn       the ballot into the ballot box,” Ugenti-Rita said. “But, in the       event that doesn’t happen, regardless of why it doesn’t happen,       you can see it that that has (an) impact on…that person’s ballot       to the election box. But, then also on the outcome. So, it’s not       a practice that really has enough benefit to justify continuing       to have it. So, that’s why I sponsored the bill and the court       agreed that it was within our statutory and constitutional       authority.”              Michelle Ugenti-Rita       @MichelleUgenti        Great News, my bill, HB2023 is upheld!! Yesterday District       Court Judge Douglas Rayes issued his decision in the Feldman v.       Arizona ballot harvesting case, and he ruled in favor of the       state and against the plaintiffs on all claims.              2:22 PM - May 9, 2018       21       See Michelle Ugenti-Rita's other Tweets              Voter fraud has become a national issue that has pitted       Republicans against Democrats. Republicans, in an attempt to       prevent voter fraud, have pushed for stringent ID and ballot       harvesting laws as Democrats have argued those efforts are a       veiled attempt to strip away minority voting power.              Ugenti-Rita said the intent behind Arizona’s law isn’t partisan.       Ballot fraud, she said, isn’t a partisan issue.                     Donald J. Trump       ?       @realDonaldTrump        Many mostly Democrat States refused to hand over data from the       2016 Election to the Commission On Voter Fraud. They fought hard       that the Commission not see their records or methods because       they know that many people are voting illegally. System is       rigged, must go to Voter I.D.              4:02 AM - Jan 4, 2018       109K       54.9K people are talking about this              “Elections are critical and the outcome of an election is       important and people have to have confidence in the outcome of       an election,” Ugenti-Rita said. “The best way to kind of effect       your government is at the election box. So, election integrity       is something that we have to safeguard. It doesn’t make sense to       allow a practice to exist that has the potential to increase       fraud and undermine the outcome of election or that confidence       in the election process.”              But Andrade points to studies that show voter fraud is not a       widespread issue and has not impacted the outcome of local       elections.              “There was not a case of voter fraud proven (in Arizona), but       yet this proceeded through,” Andrade said.              The issue is critical in Arizona because the state relies       heavily on mail-in voting. According to the Citizens Clean       Elections Commission, about 80 percent of Arizona voters choose       to receive their ballot in the mail.              “There was not a case of voter fraud proven (in Arizona), but       yet this proceeded through."              - State Rep. Richard Andrade, D-Glendale.       The ballot harvesting issue in Arizona came before the U.S.       Supreme Court in 2016 and the court suspended a ruling that       would have temporarily blocked the law while it was making its       way through the courts.              The case is now before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.       There’s a possibility the appeal could end up in the U.S.       Supreme Court again.              http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/15/dems-wage-battle-       against-arizona-s-ballot-harvesting-ban-amid-voter-fraud-       concerns.html                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca